Literature DB >> 3768671

Electrical stimulation can inhibit synchronized neuronal activity.

D Durand.   

Abstract

The effect of electrical stimulation on abnormal neuronal activity was studied in the hippocampus in vitro. Epileptiform electrical activity was induced by adding penicillin or picrotoxin to the perfusing medium. Orthodromic stimulation generated large repetitive field potentials measured extracellularly. Electrical stimulation was then applied to the neurons with a 50 micron electrode located in the somatic layer. Large decreases in the amplitude of the population spikes were generated when stimulation was synchronized with the electrical activity. The inhibitory effect was charge-dependent and could be obtained with applied electrical charges similar to those used to stimulate nerves in the central nervous system. It is suggested that this method could be useful to prevent the synchronization and propagation of epileptic seizures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3768671     DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90121-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  9 in total

1.  Desynchronization of epileptiform activity by extracellular current pulses in rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  D M Durand; E N Warman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Association of Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation Neurophysiological Features With Seizure Control Among Patients With Focal Epilepsy.

Authors:  Vasileios Kokkinos; Nathaniel D Sisterson; Thomas A Wozny; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 18.302

3.  Suppression of epileptiform activity by high frequency sinusoidal fields in rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  M Bikson; J Lian; P J Hahn; W C Stacey; C Sciortino; D M Durand
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Technology insight: neuroengineering and epilepsy-designing devices for seizure control.

Authors:  William C Stacey; Brian Litt
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2008-02-26

Review 5.  Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Towards an Evidence-Based Approach to Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Sisterson; Thomas A Wozny; Vasileios Kokkinos; Alexander Constantino; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 6.  The anticonvulsant effect of electrical fields.

Authors:  S Weinstein
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.030

7.  A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Sisterson; Thomas A Wozny; Vasileios Kokkinos; Anto Bagic; Alexandra P Urban; R Mark Richardson
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-06

Review 8.  Critical review of the responsive neurostimulator system for epilepsy.

Authors:  George P Thomas; Barbara C Jobst
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-10-01

9.  How stimulation frequency and intensity impact on the long-lasting effects of coordinated reset stimulation.

Authors:  Thanos Manos; Magteld Zeitler; Peter A Tass
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.