Literature DB >> 3764492

Assessment of a short scale to measure social support.

D P Funch, J R Marshall, G P Gebhardt.   

Abstract

A wide variety of measures have been used to assess the effects of social support on both physical and psychological status. Information on the reliability and validity of many of these instruments is unavailable; other instruments appear to be reasonably valid but involve large numbers of questions and require considerable time for completion. This study examines the properties of a short, self-administered social support scale (SSS). Data are available from 3 samples: HMO clients in a weight loss program (N = 268); chronic facial pain patients (N = 92); and colorectal cancer patients (N = 318). Three scoring strategies measuring two dimensions (structural and perceptual) of social support are compared with respect to internal consistency and criterion and construct validity. One of these strategies results in a measure that behaves in a way consistent with other, longer instruments and appears to possess acceptable reliability and validity. Scores can be broken down by source (e.g. spouse, friends), and wording can be modified to measure either general support or support for a specific situation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3764492     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(86)90356-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among people aged 85 and over living at home. Associations with reported somatic symptoms and with consulting behaviour.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Psychosocial factors and self-help in ankylosing spondylitis patients.

Authors:  J H Barlow; S J Macey; G Struthers
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches.

Authors:  N Corsini; J Fish; I Ramsey; G Sharplin; I Flight; R Damarell; B Wiggins; C Wilson; D Roder; M Eckert
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Psychosocial components of cardiac recovery and rehabilitation attendance.

Authors:  K M King; D P Humen; H L Smith; C L Phan; K K Teo
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Cancer-specific social support received by newly diagnosed cancer patients: validating the new Structural-Functional Social Support Scale (SFSS) measurement tool.

Authors:  Ulla-Sisko Lehto-Järnstedt; Markku Ojanen; Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Validation of Self-Management Screening (SeMaS), a tool to facilitate personalised counselling and support of patients with chronic diseases.

Authors:  Nathalie Eikelenboom; Ivo Smeele; Marjan Faber; Annelies Jacobs; Frank Verhulst; Joyca Lacroix; Michel Wensing; Jan van Lieshout
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.497

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.