Literature DB >> 15064935

Cancer-specific social support received by newly diagnosed cancer patients: validating the new Structural-Functional Social Support Scale (SFSS) measurement tool.

Ulla-Sisko Lehto-Järnstedt1, Markku Ojanen, Pirkko Kellokumpu-Lehtinen.   

Abstract

GOALS OF WORK: To investigate potentially health-enhancing domains of cancer patients' social relationships we evaluated various dimensions of social support as experienced in early cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In consecutive samples of 72 melanoma and 103 breast cancer patients diagnosed 3-4 months earlier, we evaluated the cancer-specific social network and received social support by the Structural-Functional Social Support Scale (SFSS) validated within the study. In addition, social support was measured by the MOS Social Support Survey as perceived support, and by Seeking Social Support items from the Ways of Coping Questionnaire as coping activity. SFSS measures the number of people who have been aware of the patient's cancer and the amount of social support the patients have received from them. MAIN
RESULTS: A large number of people from various potential support-providing sources had been aware of the patients' cancer, and the patients had received support through these interactions. A greater number of support providers did not mean an increase in the support received. Social support was distinguished into subgroups according to its source, but the division into functional support types was weak. Support assessed as perceived support or as a coping activity did not cover the received disease-specific support of several sources.
CONCLUSIONS: With the SFSS, it was possible to obtain detailed information on the disease-specific social network and social support. It may be beneficial to distinguish support according to the sources and to also measure support beyond the closest relationships. We hope that our measure and the results obtained will assist in identifying the targets for psychosocial interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15064935     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-004-0620-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  37 in total

Review 1.  Relating information needs to the cancer experience: 1. Information as a key coping strategy.

Authors:  B van der Molen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 2.  Social support: diverse theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  M J Stewart
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Gender differences in the perception and utilization of social support: theoretical perspectives and an empirical test.

Authors:  J Flaherty; J Richman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes.

Authors:  S Folkman; R S Lazarus; C Dunkel-Schetter; A DeLongis; R J Gruen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-05

Review 5.  Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis.

Authors:  S Cohen; T A Wills
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  The measurement of social support in population surveys.

Authors:  K Orth-Gomér; A L Undén
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Coping theory and research: past, present, and future.

Authors:  R S Lazarus
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

Review 8.  Psycho-oncology: where have we been? Where are we going?

Authors:  S Dolbeault; A Szporn; J C Holland
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  To randomise or not to randomise: methodological pitfalls of the RCT design in psychosocial intervention studies.

Authors:  A Bottomley
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 10.  Social support and the cancer patient. Implications for future research and clinical care.

Authors:  W E Broadhead; B H Kaplan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  11 in total

1.  Social support among women who died of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jody M Jackson; Sharon J Rolnick; Steve S Coughlin; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Mark C Hornbrook; Jeanne Darbinian; Donald J Bachman; Lisa J Herrinton
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Different pathways in social support and quality of life between Korean American and Korean breast and gynecological cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jung-won Lim; Brad Zebrack
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Worksite adjustments and work ability among employed cancer survivors.

Authors:  Steffen Torp; Roy A Nielsen; Sævar B Gudbergsson; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Cancer survivors' received and needed social support from their work place and the occupational health services.

Authors:  Taina Taskila; Marja-Liisa Lindbohm; Rami Martikainen; Ulla-Sisko Lehto; Jari Hakanen; Päivi Hietanen
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Employment and quality of survivorship among women with cancer: domains not captured by quality of life instruments.

Authors:  Linda M Frazier; Virginia A Miller; Douglas V Horbelt; James E Delmore; Brigitte E Miller; Ellen P Averett
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.302

6.  The effects of peer support group on promoting quality of life in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Fariba Taleghani; Shadi Babazadeh; Saghi Mosavi; Hossein Tavazohi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-02

7.  Baseline psychosocial predictors of survival in localised breast cancer.

Authors:  U-S Lehto; M Ojanen; T Dyba; A Aromaa; P Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Social support for South Asian Muslim parents with life-limiting illness living in Scotland: a multiperspective qualitative study.

Authors:  Eleni Margareta Gaveras; Maria Kristiansen; Allison Worth; Tasneem Irshad; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Received and needed social support in relation to sociodemographic and socio-economic factors in a population of people on sick leave due to heart failure.

Authors:  Lena Nordgren; Anne Söderlund
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2016-10-26

10.  The miscarriage circle of care: towards leveraging online spaces for social support.

Authors:  Mona Y Alqassim; K Cassie Kresnye; Katie A Siek; John Lee; Maria K Wolters
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.809

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.