Literature DB >> 3763154

Results of late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

J el-Mansoury, J H Calhoun, L B Nelson, R D Harley.   

Abstract

One hundred four consecutive patients (138 eyes) with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction were probed after the age of 13 months. One hundred twenty-nine eyes (93.5) were cured after the first probing. Based on this study and others showing the effectiveness of medical management, it is the current practice of the authors to delay probing until the patient is at least 13 months of age.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3763154     DOI： 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33621-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN： 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  9 in total

1.  Value of nasal endoscopy and probing in the diagnosis and management of children with congenital epiphora.

Authors:  C J MacEwen; J D Young; C W Barras; B Ram; P S White
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Clinical outcomes of initial and repeated nasolacrimal duct office-based probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Deok Sun Cha; Hwa Lee; Min Soo Park; Jong Mi Lee; Se Hyun Baek
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-05

3.  Long-term results after probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  S M Sturrock; C J MacEwen; J D Young
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Age-Specific Outcomes of Conservative Approach and Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.

Authors:  Apatsa Lekskul; Puncharut Preechaharn; Passara Jongkhajornpong; Wadakarn Wuthisiri
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-07

5.  Primary treatment of nasolacrimal duct obstruction with probing in children younger than 4 years.

Authors:  Michael X Repka; Danielle L Chandler; Roy W Beck; Eric R Crouch; Sean Donahue; Jonathan M Holmes; Katherine Lee; Michele Melia; Graham E Quinn; Nick A Sala; Susan Schloff; David I Silbert; David K Wallace
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  The course of epiphora after failure of silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Yanir Kassif; Uri Rehany; Michal David; Anna Popko; Shimon Rumelt
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Efficacy of probing for children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: a retrospective study using fluorescein dye disappearance test and lacrimal sac echography.

Authors:  Piero Steindler; Enrico Mantovani; Carlo Incorvaia; Francesco Parmeggiani
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Late and very late initial probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: what is the cause of failure?

Authors:  M B Kashkouli; B Beigi; M M Parvaresh; A Kassaee; Z Tabatabaee
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Mohammad Abrishami; Abbas Bagheri; Soltan-Hossein Salour; S Ali Mirdehghan
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2009-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.