Literature DB >> 3746675

Quantitative studies of enhancement and suppression zones in the receptive field of simple cells in cat striate cortex.

P Heggelund.   

Abstract

The configuration and extension of enhancement and suppression zones were compared with the configuration and extension of on- and off-response zones across the receptive field of simple cells in cat striate cortex. The enhancement and suppression zones were determined by a dual-stimulus technique where a stationary flashing light slit produced activity against which activation profiles across the receptive field were plotted with a parallel stationary test slit. The activation profiles showed less variation in receptive field configuration than plots of on- and off-discharge zones. Whereas the number of on- and off-zones varied between one and five, the activation profiles showed at least three distinct subregions in the receptive field, i.e. a central zone with an adjacent oppositely responding zone on each side. The responsivity was clearly stronger in one of these proximal flank zones. An additional zone occurred distal to the strong proximal flank zone in 53% of the cells, and in 10% such a distal zone occurred distal to both proximal flank zones. There was good correspondence between the location of on- and off-discharge zones and the location of the enhancement and suppression regions, although some subregions seen in the activation profiles did not appear in plots made with a single slit. The maximum discharge and the maximum enhancement and suppression effects in a subregion were found at the same receptive field location. The width of a subregion was measured as the width of the eventual on- or off-discharge zone determined with a single slit, as the width of the enhancement zone, and as the width of the suppression zone determined with the dual-slit technique. The enhancement zone was narrower, and the suppression zone wider than the discharge zone. The strong proximal flank zone had the same width as the central zone, but was wider than the weak proximal flank zone. For most cells the distances between successive extreme points across the activation profiles were constant, and this may explain the selectivity of the cells for spatial frequency of periodic stimuli. The strongest flank suppression occurred for most cells in that of the two proximal flank zones which had the strongest discharge to the single slit. Nevertheless, there was no correlation between the degree of discharge and the degree of suppression produced by opposite light cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3746675      PMCID: PMC1182538          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp016048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  17 in total

1.  Inhibitory mechanisms influencing complex cell orientation selectivity and their modification at high resting discharge levels.

Authors:  A M Sillito
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells.

Authors:  B W Andrews; D A Pollen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Simple striate cells: comparison of responses to stationary and moving stimuli.

Authors:  P O Bishop; B Dreher; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Variation in the spatial frequency selectivity of neurones in the cat visual cortex [proceedings].

Authors:  I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  L A Palmer; T L Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Striate cortex responses to periodic patterns with and without the fundamental harmonics.

Authors:  D G Albrecht; R L De Valois
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Receptive field organization of simple cells in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P Heggelund
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Synaptic physiology of the flow of information in the cat's visual cortex in vivo.

Authors:  Judith A Hirsch; Luis M Martinez; José-Manuel Alonso; Komal Desai; Cinthi Pillai; Carhine Pierre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Laminar processing of stimulus orientation in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Luis M Martinez; José-Manuel Alonso; R Clay Reid; Judith A Hirsch
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The timing of response onset and offset in macaque visual neurons.

Authors:  Wyeth Bair; James R Cavanaugh; Matthew A Smith; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Synaptic integration in striate cortical simple cells.

Authors:  J A Hirsch; J M Alonso; R C Reid; L M Martinez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural dynamics of 1-D and 2-D brightness perception: a unified model of classical and recent phenomena.

Authors:  S Grossberg; D Todorović
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-03

6.  Quantitative studies of the discharge fields of single cells in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P Heggelund
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Simple cell response properties imply receptive field structure: balanced Gabor and/or bandlimited field functions.

Authors:  Davis Cope; Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.129

9.  A push-pull CORF model of a simple cell with antiphase inhibition improves SNR and contour detection.

Authors:  George Azzopardi; Antonio Rodríguez-Sánchez; Justus Piater; Nicolai Petkov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.