Literature DB >> 3609205

Spatial summation by simple cells in the striate cortex of the cat.

D J Tolhurst, A F Dean.   

Abstract

Spatial summation has been studied in simple cells of the cat's visual cortex by examining the responses of pairs of lines. One line was placed in an ON region of the receptive field; the other was placed in an OFF region. When the luminances of the lines were modulated in anti-phase, the excitatory responses to the individual lines were almost synchronous. A simple cell's overt response to the composite stimulus was usually greater than the sum of the overt responses to the two components. The result could be explained by supposing that the underlying response was the linear sum of the excitatory signals but that an overt response occurred only when the underlying response exceeded a fixed threshold value. This was true even of simple cells which exhibited non-linearities of spatial summation, as judged from the waveforms of their responses to moving sinusoidal gratings. When the two lines were modulated in phase, the excitatory responses occurred in different halves of the temporal cycle. Some cells summed antagonistic signals linearly. The waveforms of their responses to moving sinusoidal gratings also implied linear spatial summation. However, other cells whose responses to moving gratings implied linearity of summation did not, in fact, sum antagonistic signals linearly. The excitatory responses evoked in a receptive field region were weaker than the inhibitory responses that could be evoked in the same region. The remaining cells did not sum antagonistic signals linearly. There was imperfect cancellation, resulting in the generation of ON-OFF response components. The excitatory responses evoked in a receptive field region were stronger than the inhibitory responses that could be evoked in the same region. These cells gave responses to sinusoidal gratings that did imply nonlinear spatial summation.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3609205     DOI: 10.1007/bf00270694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Factors influencing the temporal phase of response to bar and grating stimuli for simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  A F Dean; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; I D Thompson
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1981-10-14

3.  Spatial summation in the receptive field of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P Heggelund; S Krekling; B C Skottun
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Receptive-field structure in cat striate cortex.

Authors:  L A Palmer; T L Davis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cross-Correlation Analysis of Interneuronal Connectivity in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  K Toyama; M Kimura; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats.

Authors:  K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatio-temporal organization of receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. The receptive fields as the grating filters.

Authors:  V D Glezer; T A Tsherbach; V E Gauselman; V M Bondarko
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Linear analysis of the responses of simple cells in the cat visual cortex.

Authors:  J J Kulikowski; P O Bishop
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; J A Movshon; I D Thompson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Phase of responses to moving sinusoidal gratings in cells of cat retina and lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  B B Lee; A Elepfandt; V Virsu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  12 in total

1.  Synaptic physiology of the flow of information in the cat's visual cortex in vivo.

Authors:  Judith A Hirsch; Luis M Martinez; José-Manuel Alonso; Komal Desai; Cinthi Pillai; Carhine Pierre
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Laminar processing of stimulus orientation in cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Luis M Martinez; José-Manuel Alonso; R Clay Reid; Judith A Hirsch
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Complex cell receptive fields: evidence for a hierarchical mechanism.

Authors:  Joshua P van Kleef; Shaun L Cloherty; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  A nonlinear model of the behavior of simple cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.621

5.  'Simplification' of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and 'feedback' inactivation.

Authors:  Cedric Bardy; Jin Yu Huang; Chun Wang; Thomas FitzGibbon; Bogdan Dreher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  A dynamic nonlinearity and spatial phase specificity in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  Patrick E Williams; Robert M Shapley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The effects of contrast on the linearity of spatial summation of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D J Tolhurst; A F Dean
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Utility functions predict variance and skewness risk preferences in monkeys.

Authors:  Wilfried Genest; William R Stauffer; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Classical geometric illusion effects with nonclassical stimuli: angular induction from decomposing lines into point arrays.

Authors:  E Greene; J Fiser
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

Review 10.  Camouflage and visual perception.

Authors:  Tom Troscianko; Christopher P Benton; P George Lovell; David J Tolhurst; Zygmunt Pizlo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.