Literature DB >> 3742760

The potential gradient field created by epicardial defibrillation electrodes in dogs.

P S Chen, P D Wolf, F J Claydon, E G Dixon, H J Vidaillet, N D Danieley, T C Pilkington, R E Ideker.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the potential gradient field created by defibrillation electrodes is important for the understanding and improvement of defibrillation. To obtain this knowledge by direct measurements, potentials were recorded from 60 epicardial, eight septal, and 36 right ventricular transmural electrodes in six open-chest dogs while 1 to 2 V shocks were given through defibrillation electrodes on the right atrium and left ventricular apex (RA. V) and on the right and left ventricles (RV .LV). The potential gradient field across the ventricles was calculated for these low voltages. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced, and ventricular activation patterns were recorded after delivering high-voltage shocks just below the defibrillation threshold. With the low-voltage shocks, the potential gradient field was very uneven, with the highest gradient near the epicardial defibrillation electrodes and the weakest gradient distant from the defibrillation electrodes for both RA. V and RV .LV combinations. The mean ratio of the highest to the lowest measured gradient over the entire ventricular epicardium was 19.4 +/- 8.1 SD for the RA. V combination and 14.4 +/- 3.4 for the RV .LV combination. For both defibrillation electrode combinations, the earliest sites of activation after unsuccessful shocks just below the defibrillation threshold were located in areas where the potential gradient was weak for the low-voltage shocks. We conclude that there is a markedly uneven distribution of potential gradients for epicardial defibrillation electrodes with most of the voltage drop occurring near the electrodes, the potential gradient field is significant because it determines where shocks fail to halt fibrillation, and determination of the potential gradient field should lead to the development of improved electrode locations for defibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3742760     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.74.3.626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  14 in total

1.  Transmural and endocardial Purkinje activation in pigs before local myocardial activation after defibrillation shocks.

Authors:  Derek J Dosdall; Kang-An Cheng; Jian Huang; J Scott Allison; James D Allred; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Atria are more susceptible to electroporation than ventricles: implications for atrial stunning, shock-induced arrhythmia and defibrillation failure.

Authors:  Vadim V Fedorov; Geran Kostecki; Matt Hemphill; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Substernal lead implantation: a novel option to manage DFT failure in S-ICD patients.

Authors:  M Guenther; S Kolschmann; M Knaut
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Electrical stimulation of cardiac myocytes.

Authors:  R Ranjan; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  A systematic evaluation of conventional and novel transvenous pathways for defibrillation.

Authors:  P R Roberts; S Allen; D C Smith; J F Urban; D E Euler; R W Dahl; M J Kallok; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

Authors:  B B Lerman; H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; K Brin; C W Clark; O C Deale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Transmural recording of shock potential gradient fields, early postshock activations, and refibrillation episodes associated with external defibrillation of long-duration ventricular fibrillation in swine.

Authors:  James D Allred; Cheryl R Killingsworth; J Scott Allison; Derek J Dosdall; Sharon B Melnick; William M Smith; Raymond E Ideker; Gregory P Walcott
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Epicardial conductors can lower the defibrillation threshold in rabbit hearts.

Authors:  Jared A Sims; Stephen B Knisley Ast
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Spatiotemporal complexity of ventricular fibrillation revealed by tissue mass reduction in isolated swine right ventricle. Further evidence for the quasiperiodic route to chaos hypothesis.

Authors:  Y H Kim; A Garfinkel; T Ikeda; T J Wu; C A Athill; J N Weiss; H S Karagueuzian; P S Chen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 14.808

10.  Effects of defibrillation shock energy and timing on 3-D computer model of heart.

Authors:  R A Province; M G Fishler; N V Thakor
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.