Literature DB >> 3739886

Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction using ultrafast computed tomography.

S Rich, E V Chomka, R Stagl, J G Shanes, G T Kondos, B H Brundage.   

Abstract

We evaluated ultrafast CT as a method to measure left ventricular ejection fraction in 16 adults with congenital or acquired heart disease who underwent cardiac catheterization. CT scanning of the left ventricle was performed at 4 to 12 adjacent 1 cm levels (depending on heart size) at 50 msec/scan for one cardiac cycle, with the table positioned with an axial tilt of 10 to 20 degrees and a lateral slew of 5 to 10 degrees to best approximate the long axis of the left ventricle. Image enhancement was achieved by an injection of 25 ml of Renografin-76 via a peripheral vein, with scanning timed to coincide with maximal enhancement of the left ventricular cavity. Ejection fraction was computed by measuring the percent change in area of the left ventricle from diastole (largest area) to systole (smallest area) in a single slice at the mid-left ventricular level. Mean ejection fraction for the group was 58.1 +/- 15.1% (range 24% to 84%). The ejection fraction from left ventriculography, computed from biplane images using the Dodge (area-length) formula, was 59.6 +/- 12.3% (range 28% to 77%). There was an excellent correlation between left ventricular ejection fraction by CT and ventriculography (r = 0.91, y = 1.1x - 8.5, p less than 0.001). This study demonstrates that ultrafast CT can provide an accurate measure of left ventricular ejection fraction by simple methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3739886     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90280-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  9 in total

Review 1.  Techniques for comprehensive two dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Ultrafast CT and the cardiovascular system.

Authors:  M S Bleiweis; D Georgiou; B H Brundage
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. ultrafast computed tomography for cardiac diagnosis.

Authors:  R M MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1992

Review 4.  CT for assessing ventricular remodeling: is it ready for prime time?

Authors:  Gardar Sigurdsson
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2008-03

Review 5.  Quantitation of left ventricular anatomy and function by ultrafast CT.

Authors:  M J Lipton
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Medical imaging.

Authors:  L Kreel
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Accurate measures of left ventricular ejection fraction using electron beam tomography: a comparison with radionuclide angiography, and cine angiography.

Authors:  H K Baik; M J Budoff; K L Lane; H Bakhsheshi; B H Brundage
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-10

8.  Evaluation of left ventricular dysfunction using multiphasic reconstructions of coronary multi-slice computed tomography data in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: validation against cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sandra S Halliburton; Martin Petersilka; Paulo R Schvartzman; Nancy Obuchowski; Richard D White
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Delayed contrast enhancement imaging of a murine model for ischemia reperfusion with carbon nanotube micro-CT.

Authors:  Laurel M Burk; Ko-Han Wang; John Matthew Wait; Eunice Kang; Monte Willis; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.