Literature DB >> 3739239

Smooth and sampled motion.

D C Burr, J Ross, M C Morrone.   

Abstract

Stroboscopic or sampled motion is indistinguishable from smooth motion if the frequency of sampling is sufficiently high. We report measurements of the minimum sample frequency for smooth motion of drifting sinusoidal gratings (extended and truncated) which varied in spatial frequency from 0.06 to 24 c/deg, in temporal frequency from 1.5 to 24 Hz and in contrast from 3 to 100 times detection threshold. Threshold sampling frequency for smoothness increased with temporal frequency and contrast, and inversely with spatial frequency. The threshold step size associated with the sampling frequency ranged from 20" arc (for gratings of 24 c/deg) to 6 deg (for gratings of 0.06 c/deg). Calculations of the spurious frequencies introduced by sampling lead us to conclude that motion appears smooth provided that sampling is above the Nyquist limit and that the amplitude of the spurious components is below their independent threshold.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3739239     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90012-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

Review 1.  Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form?

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-02

2.  Displacement limit (dmax) of sampled directional motion: direct and indirect estimates.

Authors:  V D Di Lollo; W F Bischof
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-02

3.  Neural correlates of the continuous Wagon Wheel Illusion: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Leila Reddy; Florence Rémy; Nathalie Vayssière; Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Commentary on why laryngeal stroboscopy really works: clarifying misconceptions surrounding Talbot's law and the persistence of vision.

Authors:  Daryush D Mehta; Dimitar D Deliyski; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Second-order motion without awareness: passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect.

Authors:  David Whitney; David W Bressler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase.

Authors:  A Anzai; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception.

Authors:  P Werkhoven; H P Snippe; J J Koenderink
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

8.  Temporal presentation protocols in stereoscopic displays: Flicker visibility, perceived motion, and perceived depth.

Authors:  David M Hoffman; Vasiliy I Karasev; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.140

9.  Temporal modulation improves dynamic peripheral acuity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patrick; Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Pre-exposure to moving form enhances static form sensitivity.

Authors:  Thomas S A Wallis; Mark A Williams; Derek H Arnold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.