Literature DB >> 2017350

Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form?

S Grossberg1.   

Abstract

This article analyzes computational properties that clarify why the parallel cortical systems V1----V2, V1----MT, and V1----V2----MT exist for the perceptual processing of static visual forms and moving visual forms. The article describes a symmetry principle, called FM symmetry, that is predicted to govern the development of these parallel cortical systems by computing all possible ways of symmetrically gating sustained cells with transient cells and organizing these sustained-transient cells into opponent pairs of on-cells and off-cells whose output signals are insensitive to direction of contrast. This symmetric organization explains how the static form system (static BCS) generates emergent boundary segmentations whose outputs are insensitive to direction of contrast and insensitive to direction of motion, whereas the motion form system (motion BCS) generates emergent boundary segmentations whose outputs are insensitive to direction of contrast but sensitive to direction of motion. FM symmetry clarifies why the geometries of static and motion form perception differ--for example, why the opposite orientation of vertical is horizontal (90 degrees), but the opposite direction of up is down (180 degrees). Opposite orientations and directions are embedded in gated dipole opponent processes that are capable of antagonistic rebound. Negative afterimages, such as the MacKay and waterfall illusions, are hereby explained as are aftereffects of long-range apparent motion. These antagonistic rebounds help to control a dynamic balance between complementary perceptual states of resonance and reset. Resonance cooperatively links features into emergent boundary segmentations via positive feedback in a CC loop, and reset terminates a resonance when the image changes, thereby preventing massive smearing of percepts. These complementary preattentive states of resonance and reset are related to analogous states that govern attentive feature integration, learning, and memory search in adaptive resonance theory. The mechanism used in the V1----MT system to generate a wave of apparent motion between discrete flashes may also be used in other cortical systems to generate spatial shifts of attention. The theory suggests how the V1----V2----MT cortical stream helps to compute moving form in depth and how long-range apparent motion of illusory contours occurs. These results collectively argue against vision theories that espouse independent processing modules. Instead, specialized subsystems interact to overcome computational uncertainties and complementary deficiencies, to cooperatively bind features into context-sensitive resonances, and to realize symmetry principles that are predicted to govern the development of the visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017350     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  56 in total

1.  Contrast and spatial variables in texture segregation: testing a simple spatial-frequency channels model.

Authors:  A Sutter; J Beck; N Graham
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-10

2.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex.

Authors:  D H Hubel; T N Wiesel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Vernier acuity: interactions between length effects and gaps when orientation cues are eliminated.

Authors:  R J Watt; F W Campbell
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1985

4.  Cortical dynamics of three-dimensional form, color, and brightness perception: II. Binocular theory.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-02

5.  Neural dynamics of motion perception: direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

6.  Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Columnar organization of directionally selective cells in visual area MT of the macaque.

Authors:  T D Albright; R Desimone; C G Gross
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Moving attention: evidence for time-invariant shifts of visual selective attention.

Authors:  R Remington; L Pierce
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-04

9.  A complex-cell receptive-field model.

Authors:  H Spitzer; S Hochstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  How does a brain build a cognitive code?

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  9 in total

1.  Neural dynamics of motion perception: direction fields, apertures, and resonant grouping.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

Review 2.  3-D vision and figure-ground separation by visual cortex.

Authors:  S Grossberg
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-01

3.  A Canonical Laminar Neocortical Circuit Whose Bottom-Up, Horizontal, and Top-Down Pathways Control Attention, Learning, and Prediction.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-23

4.  The "Visual Shock" of Francis Bacon: an essay in neuroesthetics.

Authors:  Semir Zeki; Tomohiro Ishizu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  How visual illusions illuminate complementary brain processes: illusory depth from brightness and apparent motion of illusory contours.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Parallel processing in the brain's visual form system: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Yoshihito Shigihara; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  A massively asynchronous, parallel brain.

Authors:  Semir Zeki
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Parallel processing of face and house stimuli by V1 and specialized visual areas: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study.

Authors:  Yoshihito Shigihara; Semir Zeki
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Motion-form interaction: Motion and form aftereffects induced by distorted static natural scenes.

Authors:  Katharina Rifai; Selam W Habtegiorgis; Caroline Erlenwein; Siegfried Wahl
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.