Literature DB >> 12568134

Waste gas monitor reduces wasted volatile anesthetic.

T Y Euliano1, J H van Oostrom, J van der Aa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The increasing focus on health care costs requires that all physicians evaluate practice behaviors. The primary emphasis in anesthesia has been limiting the use of expensive medications and interventions. Reducing waste is another approach, and volatile anesthetics are an appropriate target in that simple reduction of fresh gas-flow (FGF) rates is effective. A monitor that measures and displays the cost of wasted volatile anesthetic was developed and used to determine if real-time display of the cost would result in decreased FGF rates, which, in turn, would decrease wasted anesthetic.
METHODS: The waste gas monitor (WGM) measures flow rate at the anesthesia machine's scavenger port, integrates this with agent concentration, and displays the calculated cost, real-time, on a portable computer screen. The WGM equipment was attached to the anesthesia machine in the gynecologic surgery operating room (OR) and those cases performed under general endotracheal anesthesia and lasting longer than one hour were eligible for inclusion. First year anesthesiology residents assigned to the study OR as part of a non-specialty rotation, were the subjects of the study. For each resident, after data were collected from at least two eligible baseline cases (Baseline Phase, WGM not visible and resident unaware of its presence), the monitor was introduced and data collection continued for at least three more eligible cases (Visible Phase).
RESULTS: Nine residents were initially enrolled, but due to scheduling difficulties only five residents completed the protocol. Data from cases using the WGM demonstrated a 50% decrease (3.58 +/- 1.34 l/min vs. 1.78 +/- 0.51 l/min (p = 0.009)) in the scavenger flow rates, which resulted in a 48% ($5.28 +/- 0.68 vs. $2.72 +/- 0.80 (p = 0.002)) decrease in hourly cost of wasted volatile anesthetic. There was no difference between the Baseline and Visible phases with regard to use of nitrous oxide or intravenous anesthetic agents. CONCLUSIONS. The WGM decreased wasted volatile anesthetic by encouraging decreased FGF rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 12568134     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009963021363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  21 in total

1.  Principles of educational outreach ('academic detailing') to improve clinical decision making.

Authors:  S B Soumerai; J Avorn
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Low-flow anaesthesia. Practice, cost implications and acceptability.

Authors:  S M Cotter; A J Petros; C J Doré; N D Barber; D C White
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  An educational program to modify laboratory use by house staff.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1977-07

4.  Nitrous oxide and the greenhouse effect.

Authors:  S J Sherman; B F Cullen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 5.  A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical practice recommendations: from "official" to "individual" clinical policy.

Authors:  J Lomas; R B Haynes
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Economic impact of low-flow anesthesia.

Authors:  J Matjasko
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  The circle system as a humidifier.

Authors:  J P Bengtson; A Bengtson; O Stenqvist
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 8.  Practical methods of cost containment in anesthesia and surgery.

Authors:  K E Becker; J Carrithers
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 9.452

9.  Changing anesthesiologists' practice patterns. Can it be done?

Authors:  M M Cohen; D K Rose; D A Yee
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  The successful implementation of pharmaceutical practice guidelines. Analysis of associated outcomes and cost savings. SWiPE Group. Systematic Withdrawal of Perioperative Expenses.

Authors:  D A Lubarsky; P S Glass; B Ginsberg; G L Dear; M E Dentz; T J Gan; I C Sanderson; M G Mythen; S Dufore; C C Pressley; W C Gilbert; W D White; M L Alexander; R L Coleman; M Rogers; J G Reves
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.