Literature DB >> 3725941

The radial forearm flap in intraoral reconstruction: the experience of 60 consecutive cases.

D S Soutar, I A McGregor.   

Abstract

Sixty consecutive patients in whom a free radial forearm flap was used to reconstruct an intraoral defect have been reviewed. The ages ranged from 54 to 85 years, the majority of patients presenting with intraoral carcinoma. There were 6 microvascular failures, and the remaining 54 patients (90 percent) healed uneventfully, with no incidence of fistula. Intraoral healing time was reduced to 11 days on average, and hospitalization was similarly reduced to 17.8 days. A slower postoperative recovery did not appear to be related to age or to the site of the defect within the oral cavity but closely paralleled the extent of excisional surgery. The postoperative mortality was less than 2 percent, but the overall prognosis remained poor, with a 21.6 percent mortality at follow-up (minimum 15 months). Thirty-nine patients (72 percent) underwent early postoperative radical radiotherapy without any evidence of intraoral wound breakdown or problems with flap viability. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of this method of intraoral reconstruction and indicate that such complicated and prolonged surgical techniques do not increase the risks associated with major head and neck surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3725941     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198607000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  31 in total

Review 1.  Functional reconstruction of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Peter C Neligan; Patrick J Gullane; Ralph W Gilbert
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Cheek reconstruction: current concepts in managing facial soft tissue loss.

Authors:  Lior Heller; Patrick Cole; Yoav Kaufman
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  The evolution of the pedicled radial forearm flap.

Authors:  Kai Megerle; Michael Sauerbier; Günter Germann
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-10-14

Review 4.  Choice of osseous and osteocutaneous flaps for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Akihiko Takushima; Kiyonori Harii; Hirotaka Asato; Akira Momosawa; Mutsumi Okazaki; Takashi Nakatsuka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The oral tumours of two American presidents: what if they were alive today?

Authors:  A Renehan; J C Lowry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Association of the Anterolateral Thigh Osteomyocutaneous Flap With Femur Structural Integrity and Assessment of Prophylactic Fixation.

Authors:  Mitchell L Worley; Travis M Patterson; Evan M Graboyes; Yongren Wu; Robert M Brody; Joshua Hornig; Zeke Walton
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Cephalic Vein-Pedicled Radial Forearm Semi-free Flap: An Alternative When no Suitable Vein in Recipient Site for Free Forearm Flap.

Authors:  Lei Zheng; Zhonggen Dong; Jia Zheng
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2015-05-19

8.  [Raising a radial flap with primary wound closure by prefabrication of split skin fascia flaps].

Authors:  K D Wolff; J Ervens; B Hoffmeister
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-07

9.  Clinical outcomes for T1-2N0-1 oral tongue cancer patients underwent surgery with and without postoperative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Su Jung Shim; Jihye Cha; Woong Sub Koom; Gwi Eon Kim; Chang Geol Lee; Eun Chang Choi; Ki Chang Keum
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Rehabilitation of dysphagia following head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Barbara R Pauloski
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.