Literature DB >> 3723867

Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy--visual outcome of operative and nonoperative cases.

T Fujitani, K Inoue, T Takahashi, K Ikushima, T Asai.   

Abstract

From 1968 through 1984, 110 cases (113 eyes) with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy were seen at the Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology of the Kobe University Hospital; 43 eyes were treated nonsurgically with steroid and 70 eyes were operated on by the endonasal-transethmoidal method of optic canal decompression. By comparison of the visual improvements in the two groups, the effectiveness of the surgical treatment was evaluated. In the nonsurgical group, 19 eyes showed a visual improvement, giving an overall improvement rate of 44.2%. In 9 eyes with complete visual loss at the initial visit no visual improvement could be seen. In 34 eyes with the vision better than light perception at the initial visit, vision improved in 19 eyes, ie, the improvement rate was 55.9%: the recovery occurred relatively rapidly within 3-4 weeks, and thereafter the condition remained unchanged. In 30 eyes treated within 3 weeks after trauma, 17 eyes (57%) showed visual improvement, but in 13 eyes where treatment started after 3 weeks, improvement was seen only in 15%. In the surgical group, 34 eyes showed a visual improvement; the overall rate of improvement was 47.7%. In 28 eyes where complete visual loss was seen at the first visit, 7 eyes showed visual improvement. In 38 eyes treated within 3 weeks after trauma, 18 eyes (45%) showed visual improvement, and in 32 eyes where the surgery was performed after 3 weeks, 16 eyes (50%) showed improvement. The latter improvement rate was significantly higher (P less than 0.05) than the improvement rate of 15% found in eyes of the nonsurgical group, where the treatment started 3 weeks after trauma. In cases with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, surgical decompression of the optic canal can give a visual improvement even when complete visual loss is found in the early period. The surgery is effective in cases where visual recovery by conservative treatment is not satisfactory after 3 weeks. On this basis the criteria for surgical treatment were determined: when the vision is better than light perception in the early period, conservative treatment must first be given, but surgery is indicated when the vision does not improve to 0.5 or better within 3 weeks. In cases where complete visual loss is found soon after injury, earliest possible surgical intervention is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3723867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0021-5155            Impact factor:   2.447


  9 in total

Review 1.  Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review.

Authors:  Arjunan Muthu Kumaran; Gangadhara Sundar; Lim Thiam Chye
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-25

2.  Surgery for optic nerve injury: should nerve sheath incision supplement osseous decompression?

Authors:  Alok Thaker; Dev Ashish Tandon; Ashok K Mahapatra
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-07

3.  Traumatic optic neuropathy treatment trial (TONTT): open label, phase 3, multicenter, semi-experimental trial.

Authors:  Mohsen Bahmani Kashkouli; Sahar Yousefi; Marzieh Nojomi; Mostafa Soltan Sanjari; Farzad Pakdel; Morteza Entezari; Mohammad Etezad-Razavi; Mohammad Reza Razeghinejad; Manuchehr Esmaeli; Masoud Shafiee; Mansoureh Bagheri
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Outcome of the surgical decompression for traumatic optic neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rafael Martinez-Perez; Thiago Albonette-Felicio; Douglas A Hardesty; Ricardo L Carrau; Daniel M Prevedello
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Role of the maxillofacial surgeon in the management of severe ocular injuries after maxillofacial fractures.

Authors:  Fabio Roccia; Paolo Boffano; Valeria Guglielmi; Paolo Forni; Emanuele Cassarino; Juri Nadalin; Antonio Fea; Giovanni Gerbino
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2011-04

6.  Predictive value of visual evoked potentials, relative afferent pupillary defect, and orbital fractures in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Mohammad Soleimani; Mahdi Alizadeh; Morteza Movasat; Mohammad Reza Mansoori; Zakieh Alami; Alireza Foroutan; Mahmood Joshaghani; Saeid Safari; Arzhang Goldiz
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-07-25

Review 7.  Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Eric L Singman; Nitin Daphalapurkar; Helen White; Thao D Nguyen; Lijo Panghat; Jessica Chang; Timothy McCulley
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2016-01-11

8.  Indirect optic nerve injury in two-wheeler riders in northeast India.

Authors:  Harsha Bhattacharjee; Kasturi Bhattacharjee; Lokesh Jain; Gitumoni Sarma; Angshuman Sen Sarma; Jnanankar Medhi; Dipankar Das; Sanjoy Kr Buragohain
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Visual-Evoked-Response-Supported Outcome of Intravitreal Erythropoietin in Management of Indirect Traumatic Optic Neuropathy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ahmad Rashad; Ahmed Abdel Meguid Abdel Latif; Hazem A Mostafa; Samah Mahmoud Fawzy; Mahmoud Abdel Meguid Abdel Latif
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 1.909

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.