PURPOSE: To investigate the association of posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and superior temporal orbital rim injury in two-wheeler riders and documentation of the clinical profile of such cases. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of all patients reporting with cranio-orbital injury and vision loss following road traffic accidents between October 1994 and April 2006 were reviewed and from them cases with vision loss solely from indirect optic nerve injury were taken up for study. The prognostic significance of different presenting features, role of intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMP) and relative risk of superior orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (at 95% confidence interval) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury, 35 had posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy with minor ipsilateral superior temporal orbital rim trauma and none used any protective headwear. Presenting clinical features like relative afferent pupillary defect ( P = 0.365), optic disc status ( P = 0.518) and visual evoked potential (VEP) ( P = 0.366) were disproportionate to visual loss. Only VEP had prognostic significance. The IVMP did not provide any added therapeutic benefit. The remaining 94 cases sustained direct blinding ocular trauma and 28 of them had associated intracranial pathology. The relative risk of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect optic nerve trauma was 2.25. CONCLUSION: Superior temporal orbital rim injury, even when minor, carries a potential risk for development of blindness from indirect posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy in two-wheeler drivers. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status. Only VEP has prognostic significance and the condition is untreatable.
PURPOSE: To investigate the association of posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and superior temporal orbital rim injury in two-wheeler riders and documentation of the clinical profile of such cases. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of all patients reporting with cranio-orbital injury and vision loss following road traffic accidents between October 1994 and April 2006 were reviewed and from them cases with vision loss solely from indirect optic nerve injury were taken up for study. The prognostic significance of different presenting features, role of intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMP) and relative risk of superior orbital rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy (at 95% confidence interval) was calculated. RESULTS: Out of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury, 35 had posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy with minor ipsilateral superior temporal orbital rim trauma and none used any protective headwear. Presenting clinical features like relative afferent pupillary defect ( P = 0.365), optic disc status ( P = 0.518) and visual evoked potential (VEP) ( P = 0.366) were disproportionate to visual loss. Only VEP had prognostic significance. The IVMP did not provide any added therapeutic benefit. The remaining 94 cases sustained direct blinding ocular trauma and 28 of them had associated intracranial pathology. The relative risk of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior indirect optic nerve trauma was 2.25. CONCLUSION:Superior temporal orbital rim injury, even when minor, carries a potential risk for development of blindness from indirect posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy in two-wheeler drivers. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status. Only VEP has prognostic significance and the condition is untreatable.
Posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and visual system
injury is a serious and infrequently found condition where
treatment is controversial and permanent visual loss is almost
evident.1-5 It can occur following an innocent
ipsilateral injury over the superior temporal orbital rim and is characterized by
vision loss without external or internal ophthalmic evidences
of injury to the eye and its nerve.6 Posterior indirect traumaticoptic neuropathy is seen in up to 5% of all the cases of closed
head trauma2,3 and only a few series of such reports
are available in the literature.7-9 In India it is
estimated that over 500,000 people suffer from some form of head trauma every
year and even if a 2% incidence is considered, over 10,000 of
them will develop posterior indirect optic nerve trauma and
severe visual loss. Till the treatment is known, identification of
risk factors and prevention will have a considerable role to play
in its management. The aim of the study was to evaluate the
profile of posterior indirect traumatic optic nerve neuropathy
in two-wheeler riders with injury over the superior temporal
orbital rim, in the northeastern part of our country.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary eye care
center, where case records of 129 consecutive patients
presenting with history of accidental forehead injury and
vision loss occurring between October 1994 and April
2006 in two-wheeler riders following road traffic accidents
(RTA) were reviewed. The association of cranio-orbital
injury and vision loss due to indirect optic nerve injury was
investigated. The cases reporting were divided into patients
with posttraumatic vision loss due to any organic ocular
etiology and associated unconsciousness and neurological
pathology (Group I) and those with ipsilateral vision loss
without ocular injury following outer orbital rim injury,
without any associated unconsciousness and neurological
pathology (Group II). The cases in Group I were excluded
at the very beginning. The Group II cases were taken up for
further analysis in this study and three aspects were analyzed
in detail - viz.- i) Clinical presentation and its relation to visual
loss, ii) investigation with predictor value in visual loss and
iii) response to any treatment received. Being a tertiary eye
care hospital, the patients have reported at different periods
of time interval from the injury either for a second opinion
or after being referred by the primary attending consultant.
Thirty-five cases were included for the present study as
per the following inclusion criteria. The set institutional
diagnostic criteria for posterior indirect traumatic optic
neuropathy were decreased or total loss of vision following
closed head trauma, with various grades of relative afferent
pupillary defect (RAPD) at presentation, normal or optic disc
pallor and positive Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) findings.
Recommended investigations were VEP, high-resolution
computed tomography (HRCT) and magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) of the orbit, and brain.Institutional trauma scheme for examination, investigation
and follow-up of such cases was, recording of detailed
clinical history, including mode of injury, treatment received
elsewhere for trauma and vision loss, preexisting ocular
condition, conventional ocular examination and neuro-
ophthalmological evaluation with special emphasis on visual
acuity, color vision, pupillary size, direct, consensual and
accommodative pupillary reaction, and swing flash test and
RAPD grading, dilated fundus examination including optic
disc study and its comparison to other eye. Before diagnosis
of posterior traumatic indirect optic neuropathy, fictitious
amblyopia, previously undiagnosed ocular pathology and
any neuropathology were excluded. Investigation schedule
was recording of VEP, visual field, HRCT and MRI. The
RAPD grading that was followed was Grade I; a weak initial
constriction and greater redilatation, Grade II; initial still and
greater redilatation, Grade III; immediate pupillary dilatation,
Grade IV; immediate pupillary dilatation following prolonged
illumination of the good eye for 6 sec and Grade V; immediate
pupillary dilation with no secondary constriction. Follow-up
protocol was from Day one of the injury, repeated examination
every 48 h for the first week, weekly for one month, monthly
for three months, every three months for one year then yearly
thereafter with provision of lateral entry at any stage. The
findings from the reviewed documents were recorded in the
proforma of the study. Minimum time interval for primary
analysis of a case in this study was three months. The relative
risk (RR) of superior temporal orbital rim injury to posterior
indirect traumatic optic neuropathy and its 95% confidence
interval in the study were calculated. The statistical significance
of the RAPD, optic disc status and with that of the initial visual
acuity was calculated by student′s t test and their prognostic
significance was analyzed. Statistical calculation was done
using Microsoft Excel and Statistical Software.
Results
Case records of 129 consecutive cases of cranio-orbital injury
were reviewed. Out of them 35 cases with superior temporal
orbital rim injury over the eyebrow and vision loss-associated
posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy, fulfilling the
criteria were included in the study [Table 1]. Thirty-two patients
were male (91%) and three were female (9%) with an average
age of 39 years (age range 10-63 years) [Figure 1]. Right and left
laterality of the injury was 11 (31%) and 23 (69%) respectively.
Site of injury was typically located on the ipsilateral superior
temporal orbital rim over eyebrow at the extreme lateral end.
Horizontal or vertical cut [Figure 2], black eye, edema, abrasion
alone or in combination was the presenting nature of the
wound. In selected cases, circumstances leading to injury were
accidental without any vehicular collision and the drivers were
in casual mode driving without using any protective headwear.
Majority of them skidded and fell due to unfavorable road
conditions. Eleven of them received first aid and all could drive
back home or went to their destinations and considered the
matter very minor and felt no necessity for any ophthalmology
consultation. The remaining 94 cases had history of vehicular
collision. All had some form of direct ocular injury accounting
for visual loss [Table 2]. Twenty-eight cases out of them were
unconscious and were under neurological intensive care for a
variable period of time after the accident and 13 cases of them
had residual non-visual neurological defect also. Incidentally,
except seven, the rest (n=87) of the cases were using protective
headwear during driving. The most interesting fact observed in
the study was that medial superior orbital rim injuries were not
associated with posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy
[Figure 3]. The relative risk (RR) of superior temporal orbital
rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy
was 2.25 and its 95% confidence interval (CI) was 1.25 - 4.04
in this study.
Table 1
Profile of the cases
Figure 1
Age distribution
Figure 2
Typical location of injury at the orbital rim seen in indirect
optic nerve trauma
Table 2
Profile of the excluded cases of road traffic accident
with visual loss
Figure 3
Midline injury of the forehead causes direct ocular trauma
and vision loss
Presenting clinical features of the cases (selected for the
study) were as follows. Only three patients reported within
five days following injury and the mean interval between
injury and the presentation was 37.26 days Table 1 and one
case presented as late as 180 days. Delayed presentation was
due to the relatively trivial nature of the injury and had usually
received initial treatment elsewhere. Visual acuity ranged from
no perception of light in 12 (34%) cases to 20/30 in one (3%)
case [Figure 4]. All had abnormality in pupillary status. The
RAPD grading was Grade IV - 29 (83%) cases, Grade I - 4 (11%)
cases, Grade II - 2 (6%) cases; however Grade III and Grade V
RAPD were not found in any cases.
Figure 4
Graph showing initial and final vision
Variable amount of optic disc changes was found. It revealed
generalized pallor in 23 (66%) cases, normal disc appearance
in five (14%), temporal pallor in four (11%) cases, primary
looking optic atrophy in two (6%) cases, doubtful pallor in
one (3%) case, hyperemic disc in one (3%) case. All cases with
normal disc appearance reported within 14 days of injury but
detectable disc pallor was there on 10th day post injury also. The
exact time of onset of the disc changes could not be ascertained
from the study.Flash VEP of the affected eye showed an extinguished and
flat response in 21 (60%) cases ( one had extinguished response
even for 16 × 16, 32 × 32, 64 × 64 ), reduced amplitude in seven
(20 %) cases, increased latency in six (17 %) cases and normal
response was seen in one (3 %) case.The HRCT and MRI of the cases did not reveal any abnormal
findings, except in two cases- one had hairline fracture in the
orbital plate of the frontal bone and the other had diffused
swelling of the optic nerve [Figure 5].
Figure 5
MRI findings
Records showed that 18 cases received intravenous methyl
prednisolone (IVMP) (1000 mg daily for three consecutive days)
at random of which two cases improved to best corrected visual
acuity of 20/20 but still had temporal disc pallor during final
checkup. Seventeen cases received no treatment but two of
them showed similar improvement during the final checkup.Significant visual recovery was observed in four cases (out
of total seven cases with visual improvement) [Figure 4]. Out
of these four cases, two cases had an extinguished response in
VEP at presentation but still recovered to have a good visual
acuity later on. Twenty of the 21 cases with extinguished
response had poor or no final visual recovery. The patient,
who had a hyperemic disc on presentation, regained maximum
visual acuity of 20/20 on follow-up with a subnormal VEP.
Three cases that had a good visual acuity on follow-up had
temporal pallor of the optic disc and one case had a pale disc.
Five cases that had a normal disc appearance had poor visual
acuity at presentation with a delayed VEP response. These
show no definite correlation between clinical features. The
RAPD, optic disc status and VEP had no statistical significance
(student′s t) with presenting visual acuity (P=0.365, P=518, P=
0.360 respectively). But the VEP finding was observed to be the
only predictor for final visual recovery.
Discussion
Traumatic optic nerve damage after craniofacial injury was first
described by Hippocrates.10Indirect injury to the intra-canalicular part of the optic
nerve following head trauma occurs as a result of transection
of nerve fibers, interruption of blood supply or secondary
hemorrhage and edema following shearing or avulsion of the
nutrient vessels or by the pressure transmitted along the bone
of the optic canal.5,1117The present study revealed that automobile collisions
may lead to life-threatening injury to two-wheeler drivers
and associated visual loss in them is either due to organic
damage to the eye in the form of open globe injury, vitreous
hemorrhage etc. or injury to the intracranial part of the visual
system [Table 2]. Accidental fall in the road from two-wheeler
without any vehicular collision causes an injury, many a times
trivial, over the superior temporal orbital rim in particular, if
the rider does not use any proper protective helmet. When
such civil accident occurs the rider reflexly grips the handle
more firmly resulting in the unprotected head striking the
road surface.The lateral aspect of the forehead (over the orbital
rim) is the most vulnerable point of such injury. All 35 cases
of the present study had injury over the lateral (temporal)
aspect of the eyebrow. Similar findings were observed in the
International Optic Nerve Trauma Study.12 Lessell4
found that the commonest mode of such an injury was fall from bicycle,
closely followed by automobile collision. However, similar
indirect optic nerve injury is also possible following a blow to
the face, forehead or less commonly to the temple.4,12
Analysis of circumstances leading to such accidents revealed that the
minor accidents were due to bad road condition and none of the
riders were using a protective helmet at that time of the
accident. Absence of indirect optic nerve injury in helmet user
indicates it protective role. All cases of indirect optic nerve
injury in helmet users had associated head injury indicating
very severe impact.The HRCT and MRI of the orbit and head were negative in
all of our cases except two who had orbital roof fracture and
diffuse thickening of the optic nerve. So the exact mechanism
of optic nerve injury in the present series of cases remained
ill understood. Lessell found craniofacial fracture in 17 of 33
imaged cases, and seven had fracture intersecting the optic
canal. But neither the presence nor the location of a fracture
correlated with the severity of the optic neuropathy.4 Posterior
indirect traumatic optic neuropathy occurs predominantly in
young males but can occur in both sexes and all ages.4 In our
series a similar finding was observed where mostly males
were affected.In the absence of a prospective randomized study, the
diagnostic role of different devices and management strategies
remain controversial. A RAPD defect in all the cases is the sine
qua non of an optic neuropathy, so also visual loss, and optic
disc findings. The optic disc appears normal up to two weeks
and thereafter, variable changes occur. But the RAPD (P=0.365),
optic disc status (P= 0.518) and VEP (P=0.366) were not found
significant in reference to visual acuity at presentation.No response to flash stimulation was the commonest VEP
finding. Reduced amplitude in some cases and increased latency
in others suggest that ischemic/compressive and subsequent
demyelization may be the underlying pathology responsible
for indirect trauma to the optic nerve following such injury to
the superior orbital rim. In our study, 20 of the 21 cases with
extinguished VEP at initial presentation had poor final vision.
Nau et al., retrospectively analyzed VEP in 14 patients and
found the usefulness of an absent VEP in predicting a poor
visual outcome.18 They, however, failed to establish a good
correlation between positive VEP and good visual recovery. A
similar observation was made in the present study also. Thus
our study concludes that VEP is the single important predictor
for final visual outcome but may not be the only clinical and
investigative feature for visual prediction.In our study 18% of the cases had variable and spontaneous
visual improvement in reference to the presenting vision during
final checkup. However, the literature shows that spontaneous
recovery rate is 25-55%.9,17-19 Despite an abundance of literature
on the subject, controversy exists regarding medical and
surgical management of patients with posterior indirect optic
nerve injuries.8,11,14,20-22 We could not find any
obvious benefit of IVMP in management of such cases as observed in the
International Optic Nerve Trauma Study.12Most of our cases in this study presented over a varied
period following injury because of its trivial nature, ignoring
the fact that it might cause grave visual prognosis in due course
of time. There were cases where the injury was so minor that
there was no external evidence, but the visual loss was up to
negative perception of light. The RR of superior temporal orbital
rim injury to posterior indirect traumatic optic neuropathy is
2.25 and its CI is 1.25- 4.04 in this study.
Conclusion
Superior temporal orbital rim injury even when minor carries
a potential risk for development of indirect posterior indirect
traumatic optic neuropathy and blindness in two-wheeler
riders. Presenting signs do not correlate with visual status
and VEP showed significance as a prognosis predictor.
The condition is untreatable but can be prevented by using
protective headgear.
Authors: Eric L Singman; Nitin Daphalapurkar; Helen White; Thao D Nguyen; Lijo Panghat; Jessica Chang; Timothy McCulley Journal: Mil Med Res Date: 2016-01-11