Literature DB >> 3719292

The use of pupillometry in the study of on-line verbal processing: evidence for depths of processing.

Y Ben-Nun.   

Abstract

The effect of context and task demand upon the perception and resolution of lexical ambiguities was investigated in three experiments using pupillary measurements. Sentence type (ambiguous, disambiguous, and control) was tested under three conditions ("recall," "define word," and "choose best meaning"). All types of ambiguous sentences had higher pupillary curves than unambiguous sentences, with a particularly sharp rise in pupil size following the homophone. In addition, differences were observed in total sentence rise among the three task demands, such that the definition task was higher than recall, while the "choice" task exhibited a continuing rise after the sentence, which both other tasks did not have. Results are discussed in relation to putative processing stages of sentences, such as lexical search and sentence integration, and the more general issue of depths of processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3719292     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(86)90086-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  11 in total

1.  Pupillary responses during a joint attention task are associated with nonverbal cognitive abilities and sub-clinical symptoms of autism.

Authors:  Valentyna Erstenyuk; Meghan R Swanson; Michael Siller
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2014-06-01

2.  A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia.

Authors:  Laura R Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Pupil Dilation Response to Prosody and Syntax During Auditory Sentence Processing.

Authors:  Özgür Aydın; İpek Pınar Uzun
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2022-01-14

4.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Tepring Piquado; Derek Isaacowitz; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Contrast Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Infelicitous Beat Gesture Increases Cognitive Load During Online Spoken Discourse Comprehension.

Authors:  Laura M Morett; Jennifer M Roche; Scott H Fraundorf; James C McPartland
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-10

7.  Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Jens Schmidtke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-02-21

8.  Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.

Authors:  Anita E Wagner; Leanne Nagels; Paolo Toffanin; Jane M Opie; Deniz Başkent
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Cortical modulation of pupillary function: systematic review.

Authors:  Costanza Peinkhofer; Daniel Kondziella; Gitte M Knudsen; Rita Moretti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 10.  The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.

Authors:  Adriana A Zekveld; Thomas Koelewijn; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.