Literature DB >> 3718914

Clinical assessment of corneal endothelial cell density: an original system of grading using a slit-lamp biomicroscope.

G E Rose.   

Abstract

An original system of grading of the corneal endothelial specular reflection, as assessed with a Haag-Streit 900 slit-lamp biomicroscope, has been shown to have a very highly significant relation to the endothelial cell density measured by contact specular photomicroscopy. The grading, though subjective and therefore not a substitute for the detailed record of photomicroscopy, is readily applicable to clinical practice and is a useful method of comparing and recording endothelial cell densities when assessed by the same observer. The intraobserver, but not the interobserver, variability has been examined, and the theoretical aspects of the grading system and a clinically applicable interpretation of the grading are presented.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3718914      PMCID: PMC1041058          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.70.7.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  10 in total

1.  In vivo photomicrography of the corneal endothelium.

Authors:  R A Laing; M M Sandstrom; H M Leibowitz
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1975-02

Review 2.  Changes in the corneal endothelium as a function of age.

Authors:  R A Laing; M M Sanstrom; A R Berrospi; H M Leibowitz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.467

3.  Comparative endothelial biomicroscopy.

Authors:  D J McIntyre
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1979-10

4.  Clinical specular microscopy.

Authors:  W M Bourne; B E McCarey; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Trans Sect Ophthalmol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol       Date:  1976 Sep-Oct

Review 5.  Clinical investigations on the corneal endothelium-XXXVIII Edward Jackson Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  S Mishima
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Effect of age on the endothelial cell count in the normal eye.

Authors:  R S Wilson; M J Roper-Hall
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 4.638

7.  Comparison of endothelial evaluation techniques.

Authors:  R H Langston; T S Roisman
Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc       Date:  1981

8.  Specular microscopy in cataract and intraocular lens patients. A report of 564 cases.

Authors:  M C Kraff; D R Sanders; H L Lieberman
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1980-10

9.  Endothelial cell morphology and corneal deturgescence.

Authors:  G N Rao; E L Shaw; E J Arthur; J V Aquavella
Journal:  Ann Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-06

10.  Specular microscopy of human corneal endothelium in vivo.

Authors:  W M Bourne; H E Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.258

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of central corneal thickness and endothelial cell measurements by Scheimpflug camera system and two noncontact specular microscopes.

Authors:  Irmak Karaca; Suzan Guven Yilmaz; Melis Palamar; Halil Ates
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Smartphone-based imaging of the corneal endothelium at sub-cellular resolution.

Authors:  Devrim Toslak; Damber Thapa; Muhammet Kazim Erol; Yanjun Chen; Xincheng Yao
Journal:  J Mod Opt       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 1.464

3.  Assessment of central corneal thickness and corneal endothelial morphology using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy, and Confoscan 4 confocal microscopy.

Authors:  Haya Matuoq Al Farhan; Wafa'a Majed Al Otaibi; Hanouf Mohammed Al Razqan; Alanoud Abdullah Al Harqan
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.209

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.