Literature DB >> 3717931

Randomized prospective study comparing moxalactam and cefoxitin with or without tobramycin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.

F P Tally, J M Kellum, J L Ho, T F O'Donnell, M Barza, S L Gorbach.   

Abstract

The efficacy and toxicity of moxalactam were compared with the efficacy and toxicity of cefoxitin given with or without tobramycin to 109 patients with surgical infections. A total of 66 patients could be assessed for efficacy (33 patients in each group); 13 of the cefoxitin-treated patients also received tobramycin for at least 72 h. Most patients had intraabdominal infections; 17 had peritonitis, 14 had intraabdominal abscesses, and 7 had perforation of a gangrenous appendix. There were 15 patients with necrotizing soft-tissue infections. The predominant pathogens were members of the Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides fragilis. The cure rates were 79% (26 of 33 patients) for moxalactam and 88% (29 of 33 patients) for cefoxitin; the difference in cure rates was not statistically significant. In several patients, cultures of purulent intraabdominal exudates were negative, although bacteria were observed after Gram staining; this presumably reflected the potent activity of the antibiotic therapy which had been started before surgical drainage could be carried out. Adverse effects were observed in 18 of 44 assessable patients (41%) in the cefoxitin group and in 12 of 36 patients (33%) in the moxalactam group; the difference in the rates of adverse effects was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that moxalactam is similar in efficacy and toxicity to cefoxitin given with or without tobramycin for the treatment of serious surgical sepsis caused by a mixture of anaerobic and aerobic pathogens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3717931      PMCID: PMC176385          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.29.2.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  10 in total

1.  Abdominal trauma, anaerobes, and antibiotics.

Authors:  H Thadepalli; S L Gorbach; P W Broido; J Norsen; L Nyhus
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1973-08

2.  Anaerobic infections. 1.

Authors:  S L Gorbach; J G Bartlett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Antimicrobial spectrum of Win 49375.

Authors:  N V Jacobus; F P Tally; M Barza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of cefoxitin versus clindamycin-aminoglycoside in mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections.

Authors:  G L Drusano; J W Warren; A J Saah; E S Caplan; J H Tenney; S Hansen; J Granados; H C Standiford; E H Miller
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1982-05

Review 5.  Mechanisms of resistance and resistance transfer in anaerobic bacteria: factors influencing antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  F P Tally; G J Cuchural; M H Malamy
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr

Review 6.  A review. Lessons from an animal model of intra-abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  J G Bartlett; A B Onderdonk; T Louie; D L Kasper; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1978-07

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 1,292 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States: comparison of 1981 with 1982.

Authors:  G J Cuchural; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach; K Aldridge; T Cleary; S M Finegold; G Hill; P Iannini; J P O'Keefe
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  A randomized clinical trial of moxalactam alone versus tobramycin plus clindamycin in abdominal sepsis.

Authors:  J J Schentag; P B Wels; D P Reitberg; P Walczak; J H Van Tyle; R J Lascola
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A randomized comparison of cefoxitin with or without amikacin and clindamycin plus amikacin in surgical sepsis.

Authors:  F P Tally; K McGowan; J M Kellum; S L Gorbach; T F O'Donnell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  In vitro activity of LY127935.

Authors:  M Barza; F P Tally; N V Jacobus; S L Gorbach
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.191

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Role of aminoglycoside antibiotics in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  J L Ho; M Barza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of polymicrobial infections.

Authors:  S L Gorbach
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.

Authors:  Mical Paul; Adi Lador; Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg; Leonard Leibovici
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-07

4.  Activity of newer beta-lactam agents against clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis and other Bacteroides species.

Authors:  J P O'Keefe; F R Venezio; C A DiVincenzo; K L Shatzer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Interventions for necrotizing soft tissue infections in adults.

Authors:  Camille Hua; Romain Bosc; Emilie Sbidian; Nicolas De Prost; Carolyn Hughes; Patricia Jabre; Olivier Chosidow; Laurence Le Cleach
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.