Literature DB >> 3717024

Comparison of coupling intervals that induce clinical and nonclinical forms of ventricular tachycardia during programmed stimulation.

F Morady, L A DiCarlo, J M Baerman, M de Buitleir.   

Abstract

Coupling intervals of extrastimuli that induced 57 previously documented unimorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) were compared with coupling intervals that induced 57 episodes of polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) in patients without a documented or suspected history of polymorphic VT or VF. Programmed stimulation was performed with the patient in the drug-free state, with 1 to 3 extrastimuli and 2 basic drive cycle lengths (600 or 500 ms, and 400 ms) at 2 right ventricular sites; stimuli were twice diastolic threshold. The mean coupling intervals of the first, second and third extrastimuli that induced nonclinical VT/VF (241 +/- 19, 185 +/- 19 and 173 +/- 24 ms, respectively, mean +/- standard deviation) were significantly shorter than the corresponding coupling intervals that induced the clinical VTs (266 +/- 25, 228 +/- 32 and 214 +/- 27 ms, respectively, p less than 0.001 for each). Regardless of the basic drive cycle length, the shortest coupling interval required to induce a clinical VT was 180 ms. Depending on the drive cycle length, 29 to 70% of nonclinical VT/VF induced by 3 extrastimuli required a coupling interval of less than 180 ms to induce. Therefore, a lower limit of coupling intervals may be identified below which only nonclinical VT/VF is induced by programmed stimulation. Restriction of coupling intervals to this lower limit may allow for significant improvement in specificity without compromise in the sensitivity of programmed ventricular stimulation protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3717024     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90203-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  3 in total

1.  Ultrarapid train stimulation versus conventional programmed electrical stimulation for induction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Fisher; M C Cua; S B Platt; L E Waspe; S G Kim; K J Ferrick; J A Roth
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  Can the technicalities of electrophysiological testing for ventricular tachycardia be simplified?

Authors:  D E Ward
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-11

3.  Scar shape analysis and simulated electrical instabilities in a non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy patient cohort.

Authors:  Gabriel Balaban; Brian P Halliday; Wenjia Bai; Bradley Porter; Carlotta Malvuccio; Pablo Lamata; Christopher A Rinaldi; Gernot Plank; Daniel Rueckert; Sanjay K Prasad; Martin J Bishop
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.475

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.