Literature DB >> 3715452

University-industry research relationships in biotechnology: implications for the university.

D Blumenthal, M Gluck, K S Louis, M A Stoto, D Wise.   

Abstract

The growth of university-industry research relationships in biotechnology has raised questions concerning their effects, both positive and negative, on universities. A survey of over 1200 faculty members at 40 major universities in the United States reveals that biotechnology researchers with industrial support publish at higher rates, patent more frequently, participate in more administrative and professional activities and earn more than colleagues without such support. At the same time, faculty with industry funds are much more likely than other biotechnology faculty to report that their research has resulted in trade secrets and that commercial considerations have influenced their choice of research projects. Although the data do not establish a causal connection between industrial support and these faculty behaviors, our findings strongly suggest that university-industry research relationships have both benefits and risks for academic institutions. The challenge for universities is to find ways to manage these relationships that will preserve the benefits while minimizing the risks.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach; Trade Secrets

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3715452     DOI: 10.1126/science.3715452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  19 in total

1.  The commercialization of clinical genetics: an analysis of interrelations between academic centers and for-profit clinical genetics diagnostics companies.

Authors:  Marvin R Natowicz; Catherine Ard
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Financial interests of authors in scientific journals: a pilot study of 14 publications.

Authors:  S Krimsky; L S Rothenberg; P Stott; G Kyle
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Relationships between sponsors and investigators in pharmacoeconomic and clinical research.

Authors:  K A Schulman; L E Rubenstein; H A Glick; J M Eisenberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The complexity of competing and conflicting interests.

Authors:  Stephanie J Bird; Raymond E Spier
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 5.  Attitudes of academic and clinical researchers toward financial ties in research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bonnie E Glaser; Lisa A Bero
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Biotechnology awareness study, Part 2: Meeting the information needs of biotechnologists.

Authors:  D Cunningham; S Grefsheim; M Simon; P S Lansing
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1991-01

7.  Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.

Authors:  Katherine A McComas
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  The challenge of contracting for technological information.

Authors:  R Zeckhauser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  The Influence of Industry Sponsorship on the Research Agenda: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Alice Fabbri; Alexandra Lai; Quinn Grundy; Lisa Anne Bero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Participation of academic scientists in relationships with industry.

Authors:  Darren E Zinner; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Dragana Bjankovic; Brian Clarridge; David Blumenthal; Eric G Campbell
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.