Literature DB >> 3713290

My medical care is better than yours. Social desirability and patient satisfaction ratings.

R D Hays, J E Ware.   

Abstract

It is well-documented that ratings of medical care received personally (personal referent) yield more favorable responses than ratings of care received by people in general (general referent). Hence general items are useful in achieving greater variation in responses to satisfaction surveys. However, the validity of general items relative to personal items is being debated currently. It has been hypothesized that bias due to socially desirable response set (SDRS) would be greatest for items with a personal referent. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared both kinds of satisfaction ratings for adults (N = 3,918) who scored high and low on SDRS during Rand's Health Insurance Experiment. Across sites and years of the experiment, the rating item with a personal referent was consistently biased upward for those manifesting SDRS. The rating item with a general referent was not. Further, the correlation between SDRS and the difference between ratings on the personal and general referent items was statistically significant, suggesting that more favorable ratings of medical care received personally compared with ratings of care received by people in general are in part due to SDRS bias. Results are discussed in terms of implications for constructing a valid satisfaction survey.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3713290     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198606000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues.

Authors:  Mark A Hall; Fabian Camacho; Elizabeth Dugan; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Measuring patient satisfaction for the Quality and Outcomes Framework.

Authors:  Matthew Hankins; Alice Fraser; Andrew Hodson; Claire Hooley; Helen Smith
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The development of process and outcome measures for general practice consultations.

Authors:  A Porter
Journal:  Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1997-02

4.  [Nursing homes versus assisted living facilities: Outcome quality regarding pressure ulcers, falls and malnutrition].

Authors:  J Klingelhöfer-Noe; T Dassen; N A Lahmann
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.281

Review 5.  Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Julie Brown; Kimberly A Hepner; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Patient assessment of treatment satisfaction: methods and practical issues.

Authors:  D A Revicki
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Development and validation of an instrument to measure the effects of a mistletoe preparation on quality of life of cancer patients: the Life Quality Lectin-53 (LQL-53) Questionnaire.

Authors:  Inge Kirchberger; Dieter Wetzel; Thomas Finger
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Organizational influences on patient perceptions of symptom management.

Authors:  Cynthia Thornton Bacon; Linda C Hughes; Barbara A Mark
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.228

9.  Comparison of questionnaires determining patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J G Roberts; P Tugwell
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Health care issues in Croatian elections 2005-2010: series of public opinion surveys.

Authors:  Dagmar Radin; Aleksandar Dzakula; Vanesa Benkovic
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 1.351

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.