Literature DB >> 3692863

Comparison of questionnaires determining patient satisfaction with medical care.

J G Roberts1, P Tugwell.   

Abstract

This study compares the results of previously developed patient satisfaction questionnaires which quantitatively assessed the personal attitudes of 59 patients toward their medical care. These patients, hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, were admitted to the intensive care unit of a community hospital in southern Ontario, Canada. The questionnaires were completed by these patients at four and six months post-myocardial infarction. This quantitative assessment of patient satisfaction, as indicated by Hulka and Ware questionnaires, provided data to compare the relative effectiveness of these questionnaires in measuring satisfaction. Generally, these questionnaires were reliable (r = .64, r = .59) and evidence of criterion concurrent validity was noted (r = .75-.81). Both questionnaires have comparable results concerning the prevalence of dissatisfaction (0-7 percent).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3692863      PMCID: PMC1065467     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  10 in total

Review 1.  The measurement and meaning of patient satisfaction.

Authors:  J E Ware; A Davies-Avery; A L Stewart
Journal:  Health Med Care Serv Rev       Date:  1978 Jan-Feb

2.  Behavioral consequences of consumer dissatisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983

3.  Scale for the measurement of "satisfaction" with medical care: modifications in content, format and scoring.

Authors:  S J Zyzanski; B S Hulka; J C Cassel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Validation of a patient satisfaction scale: theory, methods and practice.

Authors:  B S Hulka; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Correlates of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with medical care: a community perspective.

Authors:  B S Hulka; L L Kupper; M B Daly; J C Cassel; F Schoen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Effects of acquiescent response set on patient satisfaction ratings.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Statistical analysis of an attitude scale to measure patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  P L Stamps; J B Finkelstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder; W R Wright; A R Davies
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  1983

9.  Satisfaction with medical care: replications and theoretic reevaluation.

Authors:  T R Zastowny; K J Roghmann; A Hengst
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  My medical care is better than yours. Social desirability and patient satisfaction ratings.

Authors:  R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.983

  10 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Review of the literature on survey instruments used to collect data on hospital patients' perceptions of care.

Authors:  Nicholas G Castle; Julie Brown; Kimberly A Hepner; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The feasibility and value of using patient satisfaction ratings to evaluate internal medicine residents.

Authors:  R Tamblyn; S Benaroya; L Snell; P McLeod; B Schnarch; M Abrahamowicz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Faculty ratings of resident humanism predict patient satisfaction ratings in ambulatory medical clinics.

Authors:  P J McLeod; R Tamblyn; S Benaroya; L Snell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  ComOn Coaching: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of a varied number of coaching sessions on transfer into clinical practice following communication skills training.

Authors:  Marcelo Niglio de Figueiredo; Bärbel Rudolph; Bärbel Rodolph; Carma L Bylund; Tanja Goelz; Pia Heußner; Heribert Sattel; Kurt Fritzsche; Alexander Wuensch
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Comparing the Quality of Ambulatory Surgical Care for Skin Cancer in a Veterans Affairs Clinic and a Fee-For-Service Practice Using Clinical and Patient-Reported Measures.

Authors:  Matthew P Dizon; Eleni Linos; Sarah T Arron; Nancy K Hills; Mary-Margaret Chren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patient satisfaction with doctor-patient interactions: a mixed methods study among diabetes mellitus patients in Pakistan.

Authors:  Aisha Jalil; Rubeena Zakar; Muhammad Zakria Zakar; Florian Fischer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Determinants of Overall Satisfaction with Public Clinics in Rural China: Interpersonal Care Quality and Treatment Outcome.

Authors:  Wenhua Wang; Elizabeth Maitland; Stephen Nicholas; Jeannie Haggerty
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Statistical Methods for Item Reduction in a Representative Lifestyle Questionnaire: Pilot Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Alessio Staffini; Kento Fujita; Akiko Kishi Svensson; Ung-Il Chung; Thomas Svensson
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2022-03-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.