Literature DB >> 3712165

Effects of varying protein and energy intakes on growth and metabolic response in low birth weight infants.

S Kashyap, M Forsyth, C Zucker, R Ramakrishnan, R B Dell, W C Heird.   

Abstract

Growth (weight, length, head circumference, and skinfold thickness), retention of major nutrients (nitrogen, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorus), and chemical indices of protein adequacy (plasma albumin and transthyretin concentrations) and excess (blood urea nitrogen concentration and acid-base status; plasma amino acid concentrations) were determined serially from the time desired intake was tolerated until discharge weight (2200 gm) was reached in low birth weight infants (birth weight 900 to 1750 gm) fed one of three formulas, which provided protein and energy intakes, respectively, of 2.24 gm/kg/day and 115 kcal/kg/day (group 1), 3.6 gm/kg/day and 115 kcal/kg/day (group 2), and 3.5 gm/kg/day and 149 kcal/kg/day (group 3). Weight gain and rate of increase in length and head circumference were less in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3. Retention of most major nutrients also was less in group 1, as was blood urea nitrogen concentration, plasma albumin and transthyretin concentrations, and plasma concentrations of several amino acids. The rate of weight gain was not significantly greater in group 3 than in group 2, but the rate of increase in skinfold thickness was greater in this group. Neither nutrient retention nor metabolic indices differed between groups 2 and 3. These results suggest that a protein intake of 2.24 gm/kg/day is inadequate for the type of LBW infants studied, that the higher protein intakes are well tolerated, and that an energy intake of 149 vs 115 kcal/kg/day does not enhance utilization of the higher protein intakes studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3712165     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(86)80940-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  14 in total

Review 1.  Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Shahirose S Premji; Heidi Al-Wassia; Reg S Sauve
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-04-21

2.  Early parenteral feeding of amino acids.

Authors:  J Saini; P MacMahon; J B Morgan; I Z Kovar
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Leucine is a major regulator of muscle protein synthesis in neonates.

Authors:  Daniel A Columbus; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa A Davis
Journal:  Amino Acids       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 4.  Nutrition of the fetus and newborn.

Authors:  J M Kennaugh; W W Hay
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1987-10

5.  Impact of prolonged leucine supplementation on protein synthesis and lean growth in neonatal pigs.

Authors:  Daniel A Columbus; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner; Agus Suryawan; Hanh V Nguyen; Adriana Hernandez-Garcia; Marta L Fiorotto; Teresa A Davis
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.310

6.  Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Tanis R Fenton; Heidi Al-Wassia; Shahirose S Premji; Reg S Sauve
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  Nutrient-enriched formula versus standard formula for preterm infants.

Authors:  Verena Walsh; Jennifer Valeska Elli Brown; Lisa M Askie; Nicholas D Embleton; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-17

8.  Nutrition for Preterm Infants: 75 Years of History.

Authors:  Johannes B van Goudoever
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 3.374

Review 9.  Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I is a Marker for the Nutritional State.

Authors:  Colin P Hawkes; Adda Grimberg
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2015-12

10.  Sodium or chloride deficiency lowers muscle intracellular pH in growing rats.

Authors:  P E Ray; R C Lyon; E J Ruley; M A Holliday
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.