Literature DB >> 3712114

Correction of urinary mercury concentration by specific gravity, osmolality, and creatinine.

T E Barber, G Wallis.   

Abstract

Corrections for specific gravity, osmolality, and creatinine were applied to identical urinary mercury data in order to investigate the reproducibility of the corrected mercury concentration in a person's urinary spot samples throughout a 24-hour period; and the extent to which it is possible to predict a person's 24-hour mercury excretion from the corrected mercury concentration in the corresponding spot samples. The data indicate that on the average these corrections improve reproducibility by a factor of approximately 2. In individual cases, the uncorrected and corrected values of mercury concentration can differ by as much as a factor of 6. Similar effects were observed in the correlation of the mercury concentration of a spot sample and the corresponding 24-hour excretion of mercury. For this set of data, the corrections for specific gravity and osmolality turned out to be almost identical. The correction for creatinine was more effective than the other corrections by a small but statistically significant amount.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3712114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  14 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of creatinine and osmolality as urine normalization strategies in targeted metabolomics for the differential diagnosis of asthma and COPD.

Authors:  Mona M Khamis; Teagan Holt; Hanan Awad; Anas El-Aneed; Darryl J Adamko
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 4.290

Review 2.  Realising the Potential of Urine and Saliva as Diagnostic Tools in Sport and Exercise Medicine.

Authors:  Angus Lindsay; Joseph T Costello
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The correction of urinary mercury concentrations in untimed, random samples.

Authors:  H J Mason; I M Calder
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Methodological considerations with the use of urine samples for assessment of mercury excretion and markers of renal damage.

Authors:  Felicia Trachtenberg; Lars Barregard; Nancy Maserejian; Sonja McKinlay
Journal:  Biomarkers       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  Positive patch test for mercury possibly from exposure to amalgam.

Authors:  Tomio Mori; Kazuhiro Sato; Yukinori Kusaka; Toshiko Ido; Masanobu Kumagiri; Toshiyuki Ogasawara; Kazuo Sano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.674

6.  Enzymuria in workers exposed to inorganic mercury.

Authors:  L Barregård; B Hultberg; A Schütz; G Sällsten
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Mercury and selenium in workers previously exposed to mercury vapour at a chloralkali plant.

Authors:  D G Ellingsen; R I Holland; Y Thomassen; M Landro-Olstad; W Frech; H Kjuus
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1993-08

8.  Scalp hair and urine mercury content of children in the Northeast United States: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.

Authors:  Julie E Dunn; Felicia L Trachtenberg; Lars Barregard; David Bellinger; Sonja McKinlay
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 6.498

9.  Immune function effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bruce J Shenker; Nancy N Maserejian; Annie Zhang; Sonja McKinlay
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.634

Review 10.  Biomonitoring of exposure in farmworker studies.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Kent Thomas; Brian Curwin; Doug Landsittel; James Raymer; Chensheng Lu; K C Donnelly; John Acquavella
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.