Literature DB >> 3711946

Evaluation of two oxygen analyzers by computerized data acquisition and processing.

K Erdmann, J P Jantzen, C Etz, W F Dick.   

Abstract

Monitoring of inspired oxygen concentration during anesthesia with nitrous oxide is becoming accepted as essential. This type of monitoring demands accurate monitors that respond rapidly. We evaluated two such devices for their response patterns to rapid changes in oxygen concentration, a galvanic or "fuel cell" unit and a polarographic device. Data were stored after analog-to-digital conversion. The response patterns to stepwise changes in nitrous oxide and oxygen mixtures were recorded at flow rates ranging from 2 to 10 L/min. Both units responded accurately to all changes in the absolute oxygen concentration; the polarographic unit was, on average, twice as fast. Responsiveness to nitrous oxide was low (less than 0.4% at 100% nitrous oxide), and the stability of the signals was good. The 90% response time (T90) was consistent for any stepwise increase or decrease in oxygen concentration between 0, 21, 33, 50, and 100%. After a step change from 0 to 100% oxygen at a gas flow rate of 10 L/min, the T90 was 5.8 seconds in the polarographic device and 11.4 seconds in the galvanic device (p less than 0.01). After a decrease from 100 to 0% oxygen, the T90 was 0.6 second longer in both monitors. Comparing flow rates of 2 L/min with 10 L/min, the T90 was delayed by 1.1 and 2.3 seconds for an increase, and by 1.4 and 2.9 seconds for a decrease in oxygen concentration. Experimental data suggest that both sensors respond adequately during routine clinical use. The faster response of the polarographic device is probably of limited clinical relevance, but it may aid in calibration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3711946     DOI: 10.1007/bf01637677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  29 in total

1.  Oxygen monitors.

Authors:  T E Bachman; S L Foster; A C Norton
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Evaluation of oxygen monitors for use during anesthesia.

Authors:  D R Westenskow; W S Jordan; R Jordan; S T Gillmor
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Evaluation of Spirolog I volume meter.

Authors:  M K Chakrabarti; L Loh
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Oxygen and retrolental fibroplasia: update and challenge.

Authors:  J T Flynn
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Alveolar gas relationships during use of the circle system with carbon dioxide absorption.

Authors:  C M Conway
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Monitoring of respiratory function during anesthesia.

Authors:  I P Sergejev
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  1981

7.  General anesthesia without O2 analyzer--a substandard practice.

Authors:  R E McGarrigle
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Use of oxygen analyzers should be mandatory.

Authors:  S E Dorsch; J A Dorsch
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 9.  Oxygen toxicity of the lung: an update.

Authors:  S M Deneke; B L Fanburg
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  An analysis of major errors and equipment failures in anesthesia management: considerations for prevention and detection.

Authors:  J B Cooper; R S Newbower; R J Kitz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.