Literature DB >> 3709093

Quantitative microbiology of pressure sores in different stages of healing.

F L Sapico, V J Ginunas, M Thornhill-Joynes, H N Canawati, D A Capen, N E Klein, S Khawam, J Z Montgomerie.   

Abstract

The quantitative microbiology of 25 pressure sores in different stages of healing was examined in 25 patients with spinal cord injury. When grossly necrotic tissue was present (stage 1), 5.8 isolates per patient with a density of 6.4 log10/g was recovered, with comparable findings for aerobes and anaerobes. In the absence of necrotic tissue but with the presence of undermining (stage 2), 1.5 aerobic and 0.2 anaerobic isolates were recovered per patient with a mean density of 2.7 and 0.1 log10/g of tissue for aerobic and anaerobic isolates, respectively. The lesions were almost sterile in patients with no necrotic tissue and no undermining (stage 3). Foul smell was always associated with the presence of anaerobes in deep tissue cultures, however, six patients with nonfoul-smelling lesions yielded anaerobes. A 75% quantitative concordance was seen between swab and biopsy culture results. The quantitative concordance between peripheral and central biopsy culture results was 63%, showing variability in results from different sampling areas. No relationship was observed between the density of microorganisms and the eventual outcome of the myocutaneous flap procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3709093     DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90089-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  20 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Biofilms and bacterial imbalances in chronic wounds: anti-Koch.

Authors:  Steven L Percival; John G Thomas; David W Williams
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  [Reconstruction using the tensor fasciae latae muscle flap].

Authors:  R Ipaktchi; M K Boyce; T R Mett; P M Vogt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 4.  The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.

Authors:  Donna E Angel; Peter Lloyd; Keryln Carville; Nick Santamaria
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Microbiologic and clinical value of primary broth cultures of wound specimens collected with swabs.

Authors:  R P Silletti; E Ailey; S Sun; D Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Practical Management of Pressure Sores: Taking the patient's overall health into account.

Authors:  J M Jordan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  A prospective randomised open label study to evaluate the potential of a new silver alginate/carboxymethylcellulose antimicrobial wound dressing to promote wound healing.

Authors:  Hilde Beele; Frans Meuleneire; Marc Nahuys; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  Bacteriology of pressure ulcers in individuals with spinal cord injury: What we know and what we should know.

Authors:  Ali N Dana; William A Bauman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  [Microbial stress of skin and wounds in clinical aspects and practice. Between search and destroy and monitor and relax].

Authors:  G Daeschlein; S Lutze; M Jünger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 0.751

10.  A Primary Care Provider's Guide to Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury and Skin Breakdown in People With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Nicole R Rosin; Robyn S Tabibi; John D Trimbath; Mary Kristina Henzel
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2020
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.