Literature DB >> 3702494

Colorectal polyps and the risk of subsequent carcinoma.

A M Lotfi, R J Spencer, D M Ilstrup, L J Melton.   

Abstract

Of 323 patients with colorectal polyps that either were larger than 1 cm in diameter or were 1 cm or smaller but had been subjected to biopsy or excision, 20 (6%) had subsequent development of a colorectal carcinoma, an incidence rate of 4.6 per 1,000 person-years of follow-up. These 20 cases of cancer compared with 7.38 cases expected; thus, the risk of colorectal carcinoma in these patients was 2.7 times that in the general population (P less than 0.001). Although risks were greater for certain subgroups of patients, the differences detected were usually modest. We conclude that patients with large colorectal polyps (more than 1 cm in diameter) should be closely followed up after treatment of the initial polyp, regardless of the size, site, or histologic type of the polyp, the age or sex of the patient, or the type of initial treatment (excision or fulguration). Those patients with more than one polyp, especially if more than one segment of the colon is involved, need special attention. Examination of the entire colon is important because the site of development of carcinoma may be distant from the site of the initial polyp.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3702494     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61950-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  13 in total

1.  Surveillance guidelines after removal of colorectal adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B P Saunders
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Seun Ja Park; Jong Hoon Lee; Tae Oh Kim; Hyun Jin Kim; Hyung Wook Kim; Sang Heon Lee; Dong Hoon Baek; Busan Ulsan Gyeongnam Intestinal Study Group Society Bigs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Surveillance colonoscopy in low-risk postpolypectomy patients: Is it necessary?

Authors:  Thomas A Hornung; Roisin Bevan; Saqib Mumtaz; Benjamin R Hornung; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-20

4.  Non-compliance in surveillance for patients with previous resection of large (> or = 1 cm) colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Wolfgang-M Brueckl; Berit Fritsche; Brigitte Seifert; Frank Boxberger; Heinz Albrecht; Roland-S Croner; Axel Wein; Eckhart-G Hahn
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Establishment of a colonic polyp registry in Rhode Island.

Authors:  R Lev; R Davies; M Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Correlation of Ki-67, p53, and Adnab-9 immunohistochemical staining and ploidy with clinical and histopathologic features of severely dysplastic colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Rafiq A Sheikh; Byung Hee Min; Shagufta Yasmeen; Raymond Teplitz; Henry Tesluk; Boris Henry Ruebner; Martin Tobi; James Hatfield; Suzanne Fligiel; Michael J Lawson
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Colorectal polyps in the elderly: what should be done?

Authors:  Kenneth Miller; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Family history of colorectal tumours and implications for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence: a case control study.

Authors:  M C Boutron; J Faivre; V Quipourt; P Senesse; C Michiels
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Prognostic evaluation of planned follow-up in patients with colorectal adenomas. An interim report.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Screening and the costs of treating colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D K Whynes; A R Walker; J O Chamberlain; J D Hardcastle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.