Literature DB >> 3698813

Individual differences in the reinforcing and subjective effects of amphetamine and diazepam.

H de Wit, E H Uhlenhuth, C E Johanson.   

Abstract

This study explored the relation between the reinforcing properties of different drugs and their subjective effects. Preference for a drug (amphetamine or diazepam) over placebo was measured in a choice procedure, and mood changes after drug administration were monitored by self-report questionnaires. Individual differences in behavioral drug preferences were then examined for their relationships to subjective drug responses as well as other subject variables. In Part I, the subjective effects of amphetamine were compared in those subjects who consistently preferred (i.e. chose) amphetamine over placebo, and those who preferred placebo over amphetamine. The two subject groups showed markedly different subjective responses to the stimulant drug: the choosers reported increased positive mood and euphoria, whereas the non-choosers reported only increased anxiety and depression. In Part II, the subjective effects of diazepam in consistent choosers of diazepam were compared to the subjective effects in consistent non-choosers of the drug. The non-choosers showed appreciable subjective effects, which were predominantly sedative in quality. In contrast to the results with amphetamine, the choosers showed negligible subjective drug effects. These results underline the importance of considering more than one response measure when attempting to characterize the reinforcing effects of drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698813     DOI: 10.1016/0376-8716(86)90068-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  67 in total

1.  Vertical shifts in self-administration dose-response functions predict a drug-vulnerable phenotype predisposed to addiction.

Authors:  P V Piazza; V Deroche-Gamonent; F Rouge-Pont; M Le Moal
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Nicotine reinforcement in never-smokers.

Authors:  Angela N Duke; Matthew W Johnson; Chad J Reissig; Roland R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Individual differences in drug abuse vulnerability: d-amphetamine and sensation-seeking status.

Authors:  Thomas H Kelly; Glenn Robbins; Catherine A Martin; Mark T Fillmore; Scott D Lane; Nancy G Harrington; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: an affective neuroethological perspective.

Authors:  Antonio Alcaro; Robert Huber; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-08-21

6.  Individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience to a reward-related cue: influence on cocaine sensitization.

Authors:  Shelly B Flagel; Stanley J Watson; Huda Akil; Terry E Robinson
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  A within-subject assessment of the discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects of self-administered cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Jennifer L Martelle; Michael A Nader
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-09-21       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Does a shared neurobiology for foods and drugs of abuse contribute to extremes of food ingestion in anorexia and bulimia nervosa?

Authors:  Walter H Kaye; Christina E Wierenga; Ursula F Bailer; Alan N Simmons; Angela Wagner; Amanda Bischoff-Grethe
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  Behavioral genetic contributions to the study of addiction-related amphetamine effects.

Authors:  Tamara J Phillips; Helen M Kamens; Jeanna M Wheeler
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The amphetamine response moderates the relationship between negative emotionality and alcohol use.

Authors:  Kenneth J D Allen; Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.455

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.