Literature DB >> 3698743

Stable versus unstable orientations of sex chromosomes in two grasshopper species.

J G Ault.   

Abstract

The structural basis of orientation stability was investigated. The stable unipolar orientation of the Melanoplus sanguinipes X-chromosome univalent is unique in that it is stable without tension created by forces towards opposite poles; tension is thought to be the principle component in stabilizing kinetochore orientations to a pole. Stable orientation of the X chromosome in Melanoplus sanguinipes was compared with unstable X orientation in Melanoplus differentialis. Ten cells (five of each species) were studied, firstly in living cultures where chromosome behavior was followed, then by serial-section electron microscopy where the structural basis for chromosome behavior was examined. Microtubules other than kinetochore microtubules were observed impinging on the X chromosomes. One end of these microtubules was buried in chromatin, while the other ran toward a pole. The X chromosomes of M. sanguinipes had more of these microtubules than did M. differentialis X chromosomes. It is suggested that M. sanguinipes X chromosomes are less condensed than M. differentialis X chromosomes and so allow more microtubules to penetrate the chromosome. The extra microtubules impinging on the M. sanguinipes X chromosome probably prevent reorientation by inhibiting the turning of the chromosome towards the opposite pole, i.e., more force is needed to turn a kinetochore towards the opposite pole than can be generated and attempts at reorientation fail. This may be analogous to the effect that tension has on the orientation stability of bivalents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3698743     DOI: 10.1007/bf00327587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  7 in total

1.  Recurrent pole-to-pole movements of the sex chromosome during prometaphase I in Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes.

Authors:  R B NICKLAS
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1961       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Co-orientation stability by physical tension: A demonstration with experimentally interlocked bivalents.

Authors:  S A Henderson; C A Koch
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1970       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  Computer measurements and graphics of three-dimensional cellular ultrastructure.

Authors:  P B Moens; T Moens
Journal:  J Ultrastruct Res       Date:  1981-05

4.  Chromosome micromanipulation. II. Induced reorientation and the experimental control of segregation in meiosis.

Authors:  R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1967       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; B R Brinkley; D A Pepper; D F Kubai; G K Rickards
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.285

6.  Chromosome micromanipulation. 3. Spindle fiber tension and the reorientation of mal-oriented chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; C A Koch
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  Spindle microtubules and their mechanical associations after micromanipulation in anaphase.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; D F Kubai; T S Hays
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 10.539

  7 in total
  11 in total

Review 1.  Back to the roots: segregation of univalent sex chromosomes in meiosis.

Authors:  Gunar Fabig; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Chromosomal strategies for adaptation to univalency.

Authors:  E Rebollo; S Martín; S Manzanero; P Arana
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Tension, microtubule rearrangements, and the proper distribution of chromosomes in mitosis.

Authors:  J G Ault; R B Nicklas
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Relationship between the arrangement of microtubules and chromosome behaviour of syntelic autosomal univalents during prometaphase in crane fly spermatocytes.

Authors:  W Steffen
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  A comparative study of orientation at behavior of univalent in living grasshopper spermatocytes.

Authors:  E Rebollo; P Arana
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Co-segregation of sex chromosomes in the male black widow spider Latrodectus mactans (Araneae, Theridiidae).

Authors:  Jeffrey G Ault; Kristen D Felt; Ryan N Doan; Alexander O Nedo; Cassondra A Ellison; Leocadia V Paliulis
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Possible roles of actin and myosin during anaphase chromosome movements in locust spermatocytes.

Authors:  Lacramioara Fabian; Arthur Forer
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.356

8.  Live-cell Imaging and Quantitative Analysis of Meiotic Divisions in Caenorhabditis elegans Males.

Authors:  Gunar Fabig; Falko Löffler; Christian Götze; Thomas Müller-Reichert
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2020-10-20

9.  Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.

Authors:  W E Theurkauf; R S Hawley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 10.  Motile kinetochores and polar ejection forces dictate chromosome position on the vertebrate mitotic spindle.

Authors:  C L Rieder; E D Salmon
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.539

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.