Literature DB >> 3697997

Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer.

L D Feldman, G N Hortobagyi, A U Buzdar, F C Ames, G R Blumenschein.   

Abstract

Macroscopic and microscopic pathology review was used to assess the degree of tumor reduction after preoperative chemotherapy in 90 patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. Fifteen (17%) patients had no evident residual macroscopic tumor on gross pathological examination, and 6 of these 15 had no residual tumor on microscopic review either. There was no significant difference in disease-free and overall survival between the six patients with no microscopic disease and the nine patients with only microscopic residual disease but no residual macroscopic tumor. These 15 patients with major reduction after induction chemotherapy had a longer disease-free survival (DFS) (median not reached at 5 yr) than the other 75 patients with lesser degrees of tumor reduction (DFS = 22 mo; P less than 0.01). Clinical evaluation of response to chemotherapy was a less accurate predictor of outcome than was the pathological assessment of response. Complete clinical responders had a 4-yr DFS of 55%, whereas patients with non macroscopic residual tumor following preoperative chemotherapy, less than one-half of whom had been judged to be a complete clinical responder, had a median DFS of greater than 60 mo and a 4-yr DFS of 75%. Patients whose mastectomy specimen had no macroscopic residual disease had a 93% 5-yr survival compared to patients with a less marked response to therapy who had a 5-yr survival of 30% (P less than 0.01). No pretreatment patient or tumor-related variables correlated with the degree of tumor reduction following preoperative therapy. Achievement of a mastectomy specimen free of residual macroscopic tumor after preoperative chemotherapy is an excellent prognostic factor for a prolonged DFS and survival. This information should be considered in the selection of postoperative systemic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3697997

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  65 in total

Review 1.  Gastric adenocarcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a borderline resectable cancer?

Authors:  Yasuhiro Kodera; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Michitaka Fujiwara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Characterizing tumors using metabolic imaging: PET imaging of cellular proliferation and steroid receptors.

Authors:  D A Mankoff; F Dehdashti; A F Shields
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2000 Jan-Apr       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Longitudinal optical monitoring of blood flow in breast tumors during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  J M Cochran; S H Chung; A Leproux; W B Baker; D R Busch; A M DeMichele; J Tchou; B J Tromberg; A G Yodh
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Preoperative concurrent paclitaxel-radiation in locally advanced breast cancer: pathologic response correlates with five-year overall survival.

Authors:  Sylvia Adams; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Martin Donach; Darcy Spicer; Stella Lymberis; Baljit Singh; Joshua A Bauer; Tsivia Hochman; Judith D Goldberg; Franco Muggia; Robert J Schneider; Jennifer A Pietenpol; Silvia C Formenti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  The properties of high-dimensional data spaces: implications for exploring gene and protein expression data.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; Habtom W Ressom; Antai Wang; Jianhua Xuan; Minetta C Liu; Edmund A Gehan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Malathy P V Shekhar; Laura A Biernat; Nat Pernick; Larry Tait; Judith Abrams; Daniel W Visscher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  [18F]FDG-PET predicts complete pathological response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Claude Touzery; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Bruno Coudert; Laurent Arnould; Christophe Boichot; Alexandre Cochet; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Phase II Randomized Study of Ixabepilone Versus Observation in Patients With Significant Residual Disease After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for HER2-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Xiudong Lei; Richardo H Alvarez; Majorie C Green; James L Murray; Vicente Valero; Kimberly B Koenig; Nuhad K Ibrahim; Jennifer K Litton; Lakshmy Nair; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Funda Meric-Bernstam
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Predicting Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: ACRIN 6691 Trial of Diffuse Optical Spectroscopic Imaging.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Zheng Zhang; Anaïs Leproux; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Albert E Cerussi; Philip M Carpenter; Rita S Mehta; Darren Roblyer; Wei Yang; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue; Shudong Jiang; Peter A Kaufman; Arjun G Yodh; So Hyun Chung; Mitchell Schnall; Bradley S Snyder; Nola Hylton; David A Boas; Stefan A Carp; Steven J Isakoff; David Mankoff
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  [Morphological response to therapy of breast carcinoma].

Authors:  F Länger; H-J Lück; H H Kreipe
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.