Literature DB >> 3691163

Patient decision making: the case of delivery method after a previous cesarean section.

C S McClain1.   

Abstract

In recent years, vaginal birth after cesarean section has become increasingly available to American women. Presently, about two-thirds of women who have had one previous cesarean section choose in their current pregnancies to attempt a "trial of labor" for normal vaginal delivery. About one-third who are given the option still choose elective repeat cesarean section. This paper reports findings from a study conducted to explore how women with a previous cesarean section evaluated the two delivery options and what factors were important to them in making their choices. The data for the analysis were collected during semi-structured interviews of 100 prenatal care patients at three San Francisco Bay Area hospitals during their third trimester of pregnancy. Particular attention is given to two dimensions of patient decision making that clinical researchers studying childbirth after previous cesarean delivery have overlooked. The first describes the social motives that lead women to prefer one delivery option over the other. The second describes negotiation strategies that patients use with physicians to gain decision making power and to reduce uncertainty surrounding labor and delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3691163     DOI: 10.1007/bf00048495

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry        ISSN: 0165-005X


  8 in total

1.  One-fifth of 1983 US births by cesarean section.

Authors:  S M Taffel; P J Placek; M Moien
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cesarean section rates in the United States. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980.

Authors:  N Gleicher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Vaginal delivery after cesarean birth: frequently asked questions.

Authors:  J P Lavin
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Vaginal delivery in patients with a prior cesarean section.

Authors:  J P Lavin; R J Stephens; M Miodovnik; T P Barden
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Planned vaginal delivery following cesarean section.

Authors:  C E Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Effect of indication for previous cesarean section on subsequent delivery outcome in patients undergoing a trial of labor.

Authors:  S L Clark; G S Eglinton; M Beall; J P Phelan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 0.142

7.  Management of pregnancy after cesarean section.

Authors:  L R Saldana; H Schulman; L Reuss
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-11-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Trial of labor following cesarean section: a two-year experience.

Authors:  P R Meier; R P Porreco
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Beyond the simple economics of cesarean section birthing: women's resistance to social inequality.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague
Journal:  Cult Med Psychiatry       Date:  2002-12

2.  Women's Preferences Regarding the Processes and Outcomes of Trial of Labor After Cesarean and Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery.

Authors:  Anjali J Kaimal; William A Grobman; Allison S Bryant; Laura Norrell; Yamilee Bermingham; Anna Altshuler; Mari-Paule Thiet; Juan Gonzalez; Peter Bacchetti; Michelle Moghadassi; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods.

Authors:  Dominique P Béhague; Cesar G Victora; Fernando C Barros
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-20

Review 4.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

Review 5.  Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices.

Authors:  Mairead Black; Vikki A Entwistle; Siladitya Bhattacharya; Katie Gillies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.