Literature DB >> 3689109

Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: effects of increasing socioeconomic status.

J M Townsend1.   

Abstract

Research has consistently shown that, compared to men, women are more cautious and selective and maintain greater marital aspirations in entering and maintaining sexual relationships. One explanation of this sex difference is that women have traditionally had inferior access to earning power and social status and consequently were forced to acquire socioeconomic status (SES) through their choice of marriage partners. A contrasting view is that this difference is a component of the basic sex difference identified in the Kinsey studies: Men are more likely than women to dissociate coitus from emotional attachment and to desire and seek coitus with a variety of partners. These two explanations were explored in open-ended interviews with matched samples of 20 male and 20 female medical students. The results were more consistent with the perspective of basic sex differences than with the differential resources explanation. Increasing female SES does not appear to eliminate or even substantially reduce this sex difference. Increasing SES tends to enlarge the pool of acceptable, available sexual and marital partners for men while it tends to reduce the pool for women. Increasing SES thus tends to have different effects on men and women and may cause sex differences in the tendency to associate coitus with emotional attachments and marital aspirations to be more, rather than less, apparent. Extensive case data with verbatim quotations are presented to reveal the emotions and desires underlying subjects' overt behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3689109     DOI: 10.1007/bf01541424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  13 in total

Review 1.  INFLUENCE OF HORMONES ON SEXUAL BEHAVIOR.

Authors:  J MONEY
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  1965       Impact factor: 13.739

2.  Demography of the marriage market in the United States.

Authors:  N Goldman; C F Westoff; C Hammerslough
Journal:  Popul Index       Date:  1984

3.  Empirical tests of sexual selection theory: Predictions of sex differences in onset, intensity, and time course of sexual arousal.

Authors:  R Knoth; K Boyd; B Singer
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  1988-01

4.  Correlates of romantic love.

Authors:  K L Dion; K K Dion
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1973-08

5.  A cross-national comparison of the relative influence of male and female age on the frequency of marital intercourse.

Authors:  J R Udry; F R Deven; S J Coleman
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  1982-01

6.  Plasma testosterone level and sexual behavior of couples.

Authors:  H Persky; H I Lief; D Strauss; W R Miller; C P O'Brien
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1978-05

7.  Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior.

Authors:  G B Spanier
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1976-01

8.  Sex differences in sexual needs and desires.

Authors:  N W Denney; J K Field; D Quadagno
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1984-06

9.  Changes in sex differences in sexual behavior: a replication of a study on West German students (1966-1981).

Authors:  U Clement; G Schmidt; M Kruse
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1984-04

10.  The adolescent boy and girl: first and other early experiences with intercourse from a representative sample of Swedish school adolescents.

Authors:  B Lewin
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1982-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences.

Authors:  J M Townsend
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-04

2.  Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection.

Authors:  J M Townsend; G D Levy
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1990-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.