Literature DB >> 2337380

Effects of potential partners' physical attractiveness and socioeconomic status on sexuality and partner selection.

J M Townsend1, G D Levy.   

Abstract

Male (n = 170) and female (n = 212) college students viewed photographs, which had been prerated for physical attractiveness, of three opposite-sex individuals. These photographs were paired with three levels of occupational status and income. Subjects indicated their willingness to engage in relationships of varying levels of sexual intimacy and marital potential with the portrayed individuals. Analyses of variance, correlations, and trend analyses supported the hypotheses. Compared to men, women are more likely to prefer or insist that sexual intercourse occur in relationships that involve affection and marital potential, and women place more emphasis than men do on partners' SES in such relationships. Consequently, men's SES and their willingness and ability to invest affection and resources in relationships may often outweigh the effects of their physical attractiveness in women's actual selection of partners. These results and the literature reviewed are more consistent with parental investment theory than with the view that these sex differences are solely the result of differential access to resources and differential socialization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2337380     DOI: 10.1007/bf01542229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  9 in total

1.  Demography of the marriage market in the United States.

Authors:  N Goldman; C F Westoff; C Hammerslough
Journal:  Popul Index       Date:  1984

2.  Differentiation of sexual morality between 11 and 16 years.

Authors:  K Schoof-Tams; J Schlaegel; L Walczak
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1976-09

3.  The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction.

Authors:  D M Buss
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-04

Review 4.  Interpersonal attraction and relationships.

Authors:  T L Huston; G Levinger
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Ratings of physical attractiveness as a function of age.

Authors:  E W Mathes; S M Brennan; P M Haugen; H B Rice
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  1985-04

6.  Differences between males and females in motives for engaging in sexual intercourse.

Authors:  J L Carroll; K D Volk; J S Hyde
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1985-04

7.  Formal and informal sex education as determinants of premarital sexual behavior.

Authors:  G B Spanier
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1976-01

8.  Sex differences in sexuality among medical students: effects of increasing socioeconomic status.

Authors:  J M Townsend
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1987-10

9.  Premarital sex: attitudes and behavior by dating stage.

Authors:  J P Roche
Journal:  Adolescence       Date:  1986
  9 in total
  11 in total

1.  Lust.

Authors:  L Farrell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996 Dec 21-28

2.  Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest.

Authors:  Sally G Olderbak; Frederic Malter; Pedro Sofio Abril Wolf; Daniel N Jones; Aurelio José Figueredo
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2017-01-06

3.  The evolutionary psychology of mate selection in Morocco : A multivariate analysis.

Authors:  A Walter
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1997-06

4.  Sex without emotional involvement: an evolutionary interpretation of sex differences.

Authors:  J M Townsend
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  1995-04

5.  Mate choice differences according to sex and age : An analysis of personal advertisements in Spanish newspapers.

Authors:  Carlos Gil-Burmann; Fernando Peláez; Susana Sánchez
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-12

6.  Human facial beauty : Averageness, symmetry, and parasite resistance.

Authors:  R Thornhill; S W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-09

7.  Gender Interacts with Opioid Receptor Polymorphism A118G and Serotonin Receptor Polymorphism -1438 A/G on Speed-Dating Success.

Authors:  Karen Wu; Chuansheng Chen; Robert K Moyzis; Ellen Greenberger; Zhaoxia Yu
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-09

8.  National Culture and Culinary Exploration: Japan Evidence of Heterogenous Moderating Roles of Social Facilitation.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Yang Wang; Sotaro Katsumata; Yulei Li; Wei Gao; Xi Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-11-25

9.  Infants Prefer Female Body Phenotypes; Infant Girls Prefer They Have an Hourglass Shape.

Authors:  Gerianne M Alexander; Laura B Hawkins; Teresa Wilcox; Amy Hirshkowitz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-06-07

10.  Sexual Conflict and Gender Gap Effects: Associations between Social Context and Sex on Rated Attractiveness and Economic Status.

Authors:  Amany Gouda-Vossos; Barnaby J Dixson; Robert C Brooks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.