Literature DB >> 3688587

A comparison of two models for calculating the electrical potential in skeletal muscle.

B J Roth1, F L Gielen.   

Abstract

We compare two models for calculating the extracellular electrical potential in skeletal muscle bundles: one a bidomain model, and the other a model using spatial and temporal frequency-dependent conductivities. Under some conditions the two models are nearly identical. However, under other conditions the model using frequency-dependent conductivities provides a more accurate description of the tissue. The bidomain model, having been developed to describe syncytial tissues like cardiac muscle, fails to provide a general description of skeletal muscle bundles due to the non-syncytial nature of skeletal muscle.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3688587     DOI: 10.1007/bf02364251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  14 in total

1.  LINEAR ELECTRICAL PROPERTIES OF STRIATED MUSCLE FIBRES OBSERVED WITH INTRACELLULAR ELECTRODES.

Authors:  G FALK; P FATT
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1964-04-14

2.  Electrical properties of spherical syncytia.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg; V Barcilon; R T Mathias
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A critique of impedance measurements in cardiac tissue.

Authors:  R Plonsey; R C Barr
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The extracellular potential field of the single active nerve fiber in a volume conductor.

Authors:  J Clark; R Plonsey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Specific impedance of cerebral white matter.

Authors:  P W Nicholson
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 5.330

6.  Model of electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle based on tissue structure.

Authors:  F L Gielen; H E Cruts; B A Albers; K L Boon; W Wallinga-de Jonge; H B Boom
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Electrical conductivity of skeletal muscle tissue: experimental results from different muscles in vivo.

Authors:  F L Gielen; W Wallinga-de Jonge; K L Boon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  The four-electrode resistivity technique as applied to cardiac muscle.

Authors:  R Plonsey; R Barr
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Influence of intercellular clefts on potential and current distribution in a multifiber preparation.

Authors:  H G Haas; G Brommundt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  A mathematical evaluation of the core conductor model.

Authors:  J Clark; R Plonsey
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  8 in total

1.  Interpretation of skeletal muscle four-electrode impedance measurements using spatial and temporal frequency-dependent conductivities.

Authors:  B J Roth
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  On the parameters used in finite element modeling of compound peripheral nerves.

Authors:  Nicole A Pelot; Christina E Behrend; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Steady-state point-source stimulation of a nerve containing axons with an arbitrary distribution of diameters.

Authors:  B J Roth; K W Altman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Current injection into a two-dimensional anisotropic bidomain.

Authors:  N G Sepulveda; B J Roth; J P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Analysis of the longitudinal and radial resistivity measurements of the nerve trunk.

Authors:  K W Altman; R Plonsey
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Development of a model for point source electrical fibre bundle stimulation.

Authors:  K W Altman; R Plonsey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Magnetic stimulation of axons in a nerve bundle: effects of current redistribution in the bundle.

Authors:  S S Nagarajan; D M Durand; B J Roth; R S Wijesinghe
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Magnetic field stimulation of multicellular excitable tissue approximated by bidomain.

Authors:  R Plonsey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.