Literature DB >> 3683563

Ultrasound backscatter microscopy images the internal structure of living tumour spheroids.

M D Sherar1, M B Noss, F S Foster.   

Abstract

Ultrasound microscopes have the potential for imaging structure at depth in thick specimens, yet this is not possible in biological specimens using conventional ultrasound transmission or reflection methods. But, subsurfacing imaging is possible with ultrasound if a backscatter (pulse-echo) technique, similar to that used in medical imaging, is used. The central problem of extending backscatter imaging to ultrasound microscopy has been the development of high frequency (greater than 100 MHz) transducers with sufficient bandwidth and sensitivity to detect the low levels of backscatter from biological materials. We recently reported the development of such a transducer which we have now incorporated into a new ultrasound backscatter microscope capable of providing tomographic images at depths of up to 4 mm in biological specimens. Here we present the first ultrasound backscatter micrographs of living biological specimens. The benefits of this technique are demonstrated by its application to imaging the internal structures of living tumour spheroids showing striking contrast between the necrotic core and the viable rim of the spheroid.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3683563     DOI: 10.1038/330493a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  29 in total

1.  New applications in ultrasound technology.

Authors:  H R Atta
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Ultrasonic characterization of porcine liver tissue at frequency between 25 to 55 MHz.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhou Liu; Xiu-Fen Gong; Dong Zhang; Shi-Gong Ye; Bing Rui
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Predicting in vivo glioma growth with the reaction diffusion equation constrained by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Jared A Weis; Stephanie L Barnes; Michael I Miga; Erin C Rericha; Vito Quaranta; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Biol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Monitoring Quantitative Ultrasound Parameter Changes in a Cell Pellet Model of Cell Starvation.

Authors:  Lauren A Wirtzfeld; Elizabeth S L Berndl; Gregory J Czarnota; Michael C Kolios
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Ultrasound capsule endoscopy: sounding out the future.

Authors:  Benjamin F Cox; Fraser Stewart; Holly Lay; Gerard Cummins; Ian P Newton; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Robert J C Steele; Inke Näthke; Sandy Cochran
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-05

6.  Piezoelectric films for high frequency ultrasonic transducers in biomedical applications.

Authors:  Qifa Zhou; Sienting Lau; Dawei Wu; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Prog Mater Sci       Date:  2011-02

7.  Micro-ultrasound for preclinical imaging.

Authors:  F Stuart Foster; John Hossack; S Lee Adamson
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

8.  Induced pluripotent stem cell-related genes influence biological behavior and 5-fluorouracil sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells.

Authors:  Zhong Shi; Rui Bai; Zhi-xuan Fu; Yong-liang Zhu; Rong-fu Wang; Shu Zheng
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Ultrasound backscatter microscope analysis of early mouse embryonic brain development.

Authors:  D H Turnbull; T S Bloomfield; H S Baldwin; F S Foster; A L Joyner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  High-resolution vascular tissue characterization in mice using 55MHz ultrasound hybrid imaging.

Authors:  Ahmed M Mahmoud; Cesar Sandoval; Bunyen Teng; Jurgen B Schnermann; Karen H Martin; S Jamal Mustafa; Osama M Mukdadi
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.