Literature DB >> 3683175

Interevent differences in event memory: why are some events more recallable than others?

R L Cohen, M Peterson, T Mantini-Atkinson.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3683175     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  8 in total

1.  Learning as a function of word-frequency.

Authors:  J F HALL
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1954-03

2.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01

3.  Vividness of words and learning to learn in free-recall learning.

Authors:  E Tulving; J A McNulty; M Ozier
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1965-09

4.  An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components.

Authors:  H D Zimmer; J Engelkamp
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1985-01

5.  The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events.

Authors:  R L Cohen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1983-11

6.  Motor programme information as a separable memory unit.

Authors:  J Engelkamp; H D Zimmer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1984

7.  A comparison of two techniques for reducing context-dependent forgetting.

Authors:  S M Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-09

8.  Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance.

Authors:  L Bäckman; L G Nilsson
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.645

  8 in total
  17 in total

1.  Age differences in the recall of actions and cognitive activities: the effects of presentation rate and object cues.

Authors:  M P Norris; R L West
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

2.  Limits on the role of retrieval cues in memory for actions: enactment effects in the absence of object cues in the environment.

Authors:  Melanie C Steffens; Axel Buchner; Karl F Wender; Claudia Decker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

3.  Haptic information processing in direct and indirect memory tests.

Authors:  W Wippich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

4.  Memory for actions: self-performed tasks and the reenactment effect.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Susan L Hornstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-04

5.  The role of enactment in prospective remembering.

Authors:  E G Schaefer; M V Kozak; K Sagness
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

6.  Imagination inflation for action events: repeated imaginings lead to illusory recollections.

Authors:  L M Goff; H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

7.  Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks.

Authors:  J Engelkamp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-01

8.  The effects of interference tasks on recency in the free recall of action events.

Authors:  R L Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1989

9.  Gesturing makes memories that last.

Authors:  Susan Wagner Cook; Terina Kuangyi Yip; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Metamemory for words and enacted instructions: predicting which items will be recalled.

Authors:  R L Cohen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.