Literature DB >> 3679842

Behavioral science perspectives on health hazard/health risk appraisal.

M H Becker1, N K Janz.   

Abstract

Health-promotion efforts often employ HRA as a device for providing an individual with quantitative information about the consequences of personal health-related behaviors and as an attempt to motivate the client to adopt recommendations directed at establishing a healthier lifestyle. From a behavioral science perspective, the HRA approach and process contain elements that (at least in retrospective analysis) appear to be founded in relevant bodies of theory. First, HRA seems to be a reasonably efficient mechanism for transmitting information relative to associations between personal health behaviors and mortality risks. Moreover, while general knowledge and advice about the untoward consequences of risk factors (such as smoking, obesity, high blood pressure, etc.) are currently widespread, HRA provides new and specific information: the client's own relative risks. Some individuals who voluntarily participate in HRA bring to the experience an already high level of readiness to take action; for them, the technique may constitute the final necessary stimulus or "cue to action" [12]. Referring to a "borrowing from the future" phenomenon, Green points out that "some educational efforts are really only triggers to behavior that would have changed eventually anyway" [44, p. 159]. Thus, where motivation is sufficiently high, receipt of HRA feedback information may by itself be capable of inducing behavior change. Second, the focus on awareness and personalization of mortality risk fits well with most theoretical formulations concerning attitudes and beliefs involved in health-related decision making. Although the emphasis on mortality and often distant negative outcomes is problematic, increasing the client's perception of personal vulnerability is a psychologically defensible approach, and fear arousal can generate attitude change (although questions of appropriate level, duration of effects obtained, acceptability, etc. still need to be resolved). Third, HRA might be expected to enhance the client's perception of the benefits associated with lifestyle modifications and may even increase personal belief in his or her ability to undertake such changes in behavior. However, in light of the fact that the behaviors to be altered are complex, usually well-established and repetitive, and require different skills to extinguish, the provision of typical HRA feedback should not (on a theoretical basis) ordinarily be expected to accomplish much beyond information transmission, belief or attitude change, and the induction of some level of motivation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3679842      PMCID: PMC1065455     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  An alternate approach to health education.

Authors:  G M Hochbaum
Journal:  Health Values       Date:  1979 Jul-Aug

2.  A framework for prevention: changing health-damaging to health-generating life patterns.

Authors:  N Milio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Social networks, health beliefs, and preventive health behavior.

Authors:  J K Langlie
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1977-09

4.  Changing attitudes and habits to reduce risk factors in chronic disease.

Authors:  H Leventhal
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Toward a model of illness behavior.

Authors:  H Fabrega
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1973 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Fear communications in the acceptance of preventive health practices.

Authors:  H Leventhal
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1965-11

7.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

Authors:  A Bandura
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Selected psychosocial models and correlates of individual health-related behaviors.

Authors:  M H Becker; D P Haefner; S V Kasl; J P Kirscht; L A Maiman; I M Rosenstock
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Evaluation and measurement: some dilemmas for health education.

Authors:  L W Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Interpreting risks to the public.

Authors:  J O Mason; H G Ogden; D A Berreth; L Y Martin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of perceptions of heart attack risk: what influences perceptions and can they be changed?

Authors:  N E Avis; K W Smith; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Promoting guideline-based cancer genetic risk assessment for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in ethnically and geographically diverse cancer survivors: Rationale and design of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Rachel Howell; Rachel Ruckman; Jean A McDougall; Tawny W Boyce; Belinda Vicuña; Ji-Hyun Lee; Dolores D Guest; Randi Rycroft; Patricia A Valverde; Kristina M Gallegos; Angela Meisner; Charles L Wiggins; Antoinette Stroup; Lisa E Paddock; Scott T Walters
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  How could disclosing incidental information from whole-genome sequencing affect patient behavior?

Authors:  Kurt D Christensen; Robert C Green
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  Comparing the predictive accuracy of health risk appraisal: the Centers for Disease Control versus Carter Center program.

Authors:  J A Gazmararian; B Foxman; L T Yen; H Morgenstern; D W Edington
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.