Literature DB >> 3676701

Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration.

E K Warrington1, R A McCarthy.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the category specificity of the comprehension impairments of Y.O.T., a patient with a severe global dysphasia. Using matching to sample techniques it was possible to demonstrate selective impairments and selective preservations not only of broad categories of semantic knowledge but also of particular subsets of such categories. Specifically, Y.O.T.'s comprehension of 'objects' was, in general, significantly more impaired than for foods or living things. Within the broad class of objects she was significantly more impaired in the comprehension of small manipulable objects than large man-made objects. Within her proper noun vocabulary there was a significant dissociation between her good comprehension of proper nouns having a unique and well-known referent (e.g., Churchill) and common proper nouns without such a referent (e.g., Jones). Her error responses were not consistent, semantic similarity and significant rate effects were observed, and it was therefore considered that her category specific comprehension deficits were primarily ones of access to a full semantic representation. We attempt to give a principled account of the increasing number of seemingly arbitrary instances of fine-grain categorical impairments of semantic knowledge. We have suggested that different weighting values from multiple sensory channels will be important in the acquisition of different categories of knowledge and that such differential weightings could be the basis of the categorical organization of systems in the brain subserving semantic knowledge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3676701     DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  133 in total

1.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: event-related potentials during picture and word categorization.

Authors:  M Kiefer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

Review 2.  The anatomy of language: contributions from functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  C J Price
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Grèzes; J Decety
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things.

Authors:  Toby J Lloyd-Jones; Linda Luckhurst
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-06

5.  Deficits in lexical and semantic processing: implications for models of normal language.

Authors:  J R Shelton; A Caramazza
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

6.  Imaging a cognitive model of apraxia: the neural substrate of gesture-specific cognitive processes.

Authors:  Philippe Peigneux; Martial Van der Linden; Gaetan Garraux; Steven Laureys; Christian Degueldre; Joel Aerts; Guy Del Fiore; Gustave Moonen; Andre Luxen; Eric Salmon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Semantic memory.

Authors:  Daniel Saumier; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 8.  Is semantic priming due to association strength or feature overlap? A microanalytic review.

Authors:  Keith A Hutchison
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-12

9.  Verbal Description of Concrete Objects: A Method for Assessing Semantic Circumlocution in Persons With Aphasia.

Authors:  Sharon M Antonucci; Colleen MacWilliam
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Contrasting effects of repetition across tasks: implications for understanding the nature of refractory behavior and models of semantic memory.

Authors:  Emer M E Forde; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.