Literature DB >> 3675192

Reliability of implantable central venous access devices in patients with cancer.

G V Stanislav1, R J Fitzgibbons, R T Bailey, J A Mailliard, P S Johnson, J B Feole.   

Abstract

We reviewed complications requiring removal of Hickman catheters (HCs) and implantable central venous access devices (ICVADs) in patients with cancer over a 30-month period. The study was unique in the sense that patients chose which system would be inserted, unless continuous infusion was anticipated. A total of 115 systems were inserted in 102 patients. Forty-four HCs were inserted in 34 patients (total system days, 8533 [mean, 194 days]); 71 ICVADs were inserted in 68 patients (total system days, 18,681 [mean, 263 days]). Complications required removal in 38.6% of HCs and 18.3% of ICVADs. Complication rates were one in 501 days in the HC group and one in 1450 days in the ICVAD group. Although 15 systems were removed for suspected infection, closer analysis revealed that bacteremia ultimately found to be unrelated to the catheter resulted in premature removal in many cases. The catheter tip was located high in the superior vena cava or in the subclavian vein in all systems removed due to thrombosis. Miscellaneous complications in HCs included dislodgment and catheter embolism. The increased longevity, lower complication rate, and decreased maintenance requirements in the use of ICVADs support their superiority over HCs in the treatment of patients with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3675192     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400230066012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  5 in total

1.  Verification of correct central venous catheter placement in the emergency department: comparison between ultrasonography and chest radiography.

Authors:  Maurizio Zanobetti; Alessandro Coppa; Federico Bulletti; Serena Piazza; Peyman Nazerian; Alberto Conti; Francesca Innocenti; Stefano Ponchietti; Sofia Bigiarini; Aurelia Guzzo; Claudio Poggioni; Beatrice Del Taglia; Yuri Mariannini; Riccardo Pini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Retrospective Assessment of Patient and Catheter Characteristics Associated With Malpositioned Central Venous Catheters in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Mark D Weber; Thomas Conlon; Charlotte Woods-Hill; Stephanie L Watts; Eileen Nelson; Danielle Traynor; Bingqing Zhang; Daniela Davis; Adam S Himebauch
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.624

3.  Analysis of risk factors for central venous port failure in cancer patients.

Authors:  Ching-Chuan Hsieh; Hsu-Huei Weng; Wen-Shih Huang; Wen-Ke Wang; Chiung-Lun Kao; Ming-Shian Lu; Chia-Siu Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The use of an implantable central venous (Hickman) catheter for long-term venous access in dogs undergoing bone marrow transplantation.

Authors:  A C Abrams-Ogg; S A Kruth; R F Carter; V E Valli; S Kamel-Reid; I D Dubé
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 1.310

5.  Right or left? Side selection for a totally implantable vascular access device: a randomised observational study.

Authors:  Wen-Ying Lin; Chih-Peng Lin; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ying-Hui Lee; Yi-Ting Lin; Meng-Chi Hsu; Yu-Yun Shao
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.