Literature DB >> 3674265

The biomechanics of lateral knee bracing. Part I: Response of the valgus restraints to loading.

L E Paulos1, E P France, T D Rosenberg, G Jayaraman, P J Abbott, J Jaen.   

Abstract

To better understand the role of preventive knee braces in injury prevention, a biomechanical study using fresh frozen cadaveric knees (N = 18) was conducted. Ligament tensions and joint displacements were measured at static, nondestructive valgus forces as well as low-rate destructive forces. After quantifying and establishing individual ligament contributions to valgus restraining function, knees were then braced with two different laterally applied preventive braces, the McDavid Knee Guard and the Omni Anderson Knee Stabler. The effects of lateral bracing were analyzed according to valgus force, joint line opening, and ligament tensions. Valgus applied forces, with or without braces, consistently produced medial collateral ligament (MCL) disruptions at ligament tensions surprisingly higher than the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and higher than or equal to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Although large joint displacements were necessary for complete ligament failure, bundle disruption in the MCL, ACL, and PCL was noted at much smaller joint openings. In Part I of this study, no significant protection could be documented with the two preventive braces used. Also, four potentially adverse effects were noted: MCL preload, center axis shift, premature joint line contact, and brace slippage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3674265     DOI: 10.1177/036354658701500501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  15 in total

Review 1.  The effects of functional knee bracing on muscle function and performance.

Authors:  J Styf
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  A 'plane' explanation of anterior cruciate ligament injury mechanisms: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carmen E Quatman; Catherine C Quatman-Yates; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  MCL injuries of the knee: current concepts review.

Authors:  Phinit Phisitkul; Stan L James; Brian R Wolf; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2006

4.  Muscular and functional performance characteristics of individuals wearing prophylactic knee braces.

Authors:  P A Borsa; S M Lephart; F H Fu
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  The Effects of Prophylactic Brace Construction Materials on the Reactive Responses of the MCL During Repetitive Impacts.

Authors:  P E Patterson; J Eason
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  Medial collateral ligament injuries in athletes.

Authors:  B Reider
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  The knee brace controversy.

Authors:  D L Montgomery; P L Koziris
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Use of knee braces in sport. Current recommendations.

Authors:  J P Albright; A Saterbak; J Stokes
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  The potential role of prophylactic/functional knee bracing in preventing knee ligament injury.

Authors:  Neetu Rishiraj; Jack E Taunton; Robert Lloyd-Smith; Robert Woollard; William Regan; D B Clement
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 10.  The anterior cruciate ligament injury controversy: is "valgus collapse" a sex-specific mechanism?

Authors:  C E Quatman; T E Hewett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 13.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.