| Literature DB >> 3674055 |
W G Vincken1, M G Elleker, M G Cosio.
Abstract
In order to identify the changes in pulmonary function and in the flow-volume loop due to respiratory muscle weakness, two groups of 10 nonsmokers with stable, chronic neuromuscular disease but without respiratory symptoms were studied: one without (Group 1) and one with (Group 2) respiratory muscle weakness as assessed by measurement of maximal static inspiratory and expiratory pressures. In Group 1, pulmonary function was normal except for increased ratio of one-second forced expiratory volume to forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75 percent forced vital capacity, which may reflect increased elastic lung recoil. Group 2 had mild volume restriction, appropriate for the degree of respiratory muscle weakness, and reduced inspiratory and expiratory flow rates. Pulmonary function was significantly more disturbed in Group 2 than in Group 1, and correlated well with maximal static inspiratory and expiratory pressures. Analysis of the flow-volume loop configuration revealed that four parameters describing effort-dependent portions were significantly related to maximal static inspiratory pressure and maximal static expiratory pressure. These parameters were peak expiratory flow, the slope of the ascending limb of the maximal expiratory curve, a drop of forced expiratory flow near residual volume, and forced inspiratory flow at 50 percent of vital capacity. A flow-volume loop score obtained from these four parameters was significantly higher in Group 2 than in Group 1 (2.8 +/- 1.03 versus 1.1 +/- 1.37; p less than 0.01). A flow-volume loop score of 2 or more had 80 percent specificity and 90 percent sensitivity in predicting respiratory muscle weakness in these patients with chronic neuromuscular disease. These data suggest that sensitive assessment of the flow-volume loop configuration as part of routine pulmonary function testing may help to suspect and identify respiratory muscle weakness.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3674055 DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90897-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Med ISSN: 0002-9343 Impact factor: 4.965