Literature DB >> 3667642

Further follow-up on socket fixation using a metal-backed acetabular component for total hip replacement. A minimum ten-year follow-up study.

W H Harris1, B L Penenberg.   

Abstract

In 1982, Harris and White reported the data after a minimum five-year follow-up of fifty-three total hip replacements in forty-seven patients in whom a cemented metal-backed acetabular component had been used. There actually had been fifty-four total hip replacements in fifty-three hips, as in one hip a revision was done for a traumatic disruption of the initial acetabular component that occurred two months after the first insertion. Six of the fifty-four operations did not qualify for inclusion in this ten-year follow-up study, including four operations in three patients who had died before that time. The remaining forty-eight hips have been followed for ten to 13.5 years (mean, 11.3 years). With one exception, the ages of the patients at the time of the index operation ranged from seventeen to fifty years (mean, forty-one years). Six (12.5 per cent) of the forty-eight hips required revision because of symptomatic aseptic loosening of the acetabular component. In addition, two acetabular components, although they were not loose, were revised concomitantly with revision of the femoral component because of the presence of radiolucent lines at the cement-bone interface of the acetabular implant. One other acetabular component that was not loose was revised because of unexplained pain, one was removed because of sepsis, and for one only the polyethylene liner was exchanged because of damage to the polyethylene when the weld holding the femoral head to the femoral neck failed. Nine additional hips (19 per cent), although they were not revised, showed radiographic evidence of migration, and one (2 per cent) showed radiographic evidence of impending failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3667642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  6 in total

1.  The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; David J Biau; Denis Huten; Thierry Musset; François Gaucher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Tantalum Versus Titanium Acetabular Cups in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Current Concept and a Review of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Rohit Rambani; Mayur Nayak; Miss Sheweidin Aziz; Krishan Almeida
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-05

Review 3.  Role of Hip Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Avascular Necrosis of the Hip: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Omid Shahpari; Javad Mortazavi; Mohammad H Ebrahimzadeh; Farshid Bagheri; Alireza Mousavian
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-06

4.  The 2018 Otto Aufranc Award: How Does Genome-wide Variation Affect Osteolysis Risk After THA?

Authors:  Scott J MacInnes; Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas; Anne Marie Fenstad; Karan Shah; Lorraine Southam; Ioanna Tachmazidou; Geir Hallan; Hårvard Dale; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Ove Furnes; Eleftheria Zeggini; J Mark Wilkinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  India Joining the World of Hip and Knee Registries: Present Status-A Leap Forward.

Authors:  Shrinand V Vaidya; Abhinav D Jogani; Jahavir A Pachore; Richard Armstrong; Chintan S Vaidya
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Use of kernel-based Bayesian models to predict late osteolysis after hip replacement.

Authors:  P Aram; V Kadirkamanathan; J M Wilkinson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.118

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.