Literature DB >> 3664916

Evaluation of the Humphrey A.D.E. breathing system.

A A Artru1, R A Katz.   

Abstract

A new breathing circuit (the Humphrey A.D.E., double lever model) was evaluated in adults to determine (1) the fresh gas flow (FGF) needed to achieve normocapnia during controlled ventilation and to just induce rebreathing during spontaneous ventilation, (2) end-expired CO2 (PECO2) at those FGF values, (3) the standard deviation of FGF requirements for controlled and spontaneous breathing (reliability of recommended FGF settings) and (4) the magnitude of change in PECO2 produced by varying FGF from the recommended values (sensitivity of the system). The FGFs that provided normocapnia with controlled ventilation and just induced rebreathing with spontaneous ventilation were 67 +/- 10 and 52 +/- 7 ml . kg-1 . min-1 (mean +/- SD), respectively. PECO2 values were 36.0 +/- 0.3 and 41.6 +/- 3.9 mmHg respectively. During controlled ventilation low reliability was offset by low sensitivity so that PECO2 changed little when FGF was raised or lowered from recommended values (0.2 mmHg/ml . kg-1 . min-1). In contrast, during spontaneous ventilation low reliability was additive with high sensitivity when using FGFs lower than the mean value that just induced rebreathing. A threshold was reached where lowering FGF from recommended values caused large changes in PECO2 (1.1 mmHg/ml . kg-1 . min-1). It is concluded that the FGF recommended by Humphrey for controlled ventilation is satisfactory. However, the FGF recommended by Humphrey for spontaneous ventilation may result in hypercapnia in some patients. This can be prevented either by using a higher FGF of 66 ml . kg-1 . min-1 routinely in all patients or by using lower flows with CO2 monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3664916     DOI: 10.1007/BF03014355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  8 in total

1.  Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. lowflow universal anaesthetic breathing system. Part II: Comparison with Bain system in anaesthesized adults during controlled ventilation.

Authors:  D Humphrey; J G Brock-Utne; J W Downing
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

2.  The Bain anaesthetic system. An assessment during controlled ventilation.

Authors:  J D Henville; A P Adams
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Bain anaesthetic system and gender.

Authors:  E Romano; M Pegoraro; S Fasiolo; A Gullo
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Single lever Humphrey A.D.E. low flow universal anaesthetic breathing system. Part I: Comparison with dual lever A.D.E., Magill and Bain systems in anaesthetized spontaneously breathing adults.

Authors:  D Humphrey; J G Brock-Utne; J W Downing
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-11

5.  Surgical stimulation antagonizes the respiratory depression produced by forane.

Authors:  E I Eger; W M Dolan; W C Stevens; R D Miller; W L Way
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  The ADE anaesthetic breathing system.

Authors:  D Humphrey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  An assessment of the Humphrey ADE anaesthetic system in the Mapleson A mode during spontaneous ventilation.

Authors:  J Dixon; M K Chakrabarti; M Morgan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  A new anaesthetic breathing system combining Mapleson A, D and E principles. A simple apparatus for low flow universal use without carbon dioxide absorption.

Authors:  D Humphrey
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 6.955

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Humphrey A.D.E. system.

Authors:  D Humphrey
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 5.063

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.