Literature DB >> 3657485

Metabolic responses during hydraulic resistance exercise.

D L Ballor1, M D Becque, V L Katch.   

Abstract

Thirteen college-age men under-went a treadmill (TM)-graded VO2max exercise test on 1 d and a 24.5-min hydraulic resistive exercise circuit on a following day. Seven exercises were performed in the following order: leg extension, bent-over row, bicep curl, squat, upright row, bench press, and behind-neck press. Each exercise was performed three times with the following work-to-rest timing: 30 s exercise, 30 s rest; 30 s exercise; 30 s rest; and 30 s exercise, 60 s rest (to allow for machine switch-over to the next exercise). Thus, each exercise took a total of 120 s, of which work was for 90 s and rest 120 s. During the circuit, heart rate averaged 153.8 b X min-1 (81.2% of TM max) and VO2 averaged 1.93 l X min-1 (41.4% of TM max). Oxygen uptake for the individual exercises ranged from 1.52 l X min-1 (32.6% of TM max) for the behind-neck-press exercise to 2.43 l X min-1 (52.1% of TM max) for the squat exercise. Heart rate ranged from 135.9 b X min-1 (71.8% of TM max) for the leg extension exercise to 163.4 b X min-1 (86.3% of TM max) for the squat exercise. Hydraulic circuit resistance exercise results in an average caloric expenditure of 40.8 kJ X min-1 (9.75 kcal X min-1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3657485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  10 in total

1.  Effect of exercise to rest ratio on plasma lactate concentration at work rates above and below maximum oxygen uptake.

Authors:  D L Ballor; A J Volovsek
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Physiological adaptations to velocity-controlled resistance training.

Authors:  G J Bell; H A Wenger
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Resistance exercise biology: manipulation of resistance exercise programme variables determines the responses of cellular and molecular signalling pathways.

Authors:  Barry A Spiering; William J Kraemer; Jeffrey M Anderson; Lawrence E Armstrong; Bradley C Nindl; Jeff S Volek; Carl M Maresh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Strength training and lipoprotein-lipid profiles. A critical analysis and recommendations for further study.

Authors:  P F Kokkinos; B F Hurley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Training Considerations for Optimising Endurance Development: An Alternate Concurrent Training Perspective.

Authors:  Kenji Doma; Glen B Deakin; Mortiz Schumann; David J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Effects of load and training modes on physiological and metabolic responses in resistance exercise.

Authors:  S Buitrago; N Wirtz; Z Yue; H Kleinöder; J Mester
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Hormonal responses and adaptations to resistance exercise and training.

Authors:  William J Kraemer; Nicholas A Ratamess
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Oxygen Consumption (VO2) and Surface Electromyography (sEMG) during Moderate-Strength Training Exercises.

Authors:  Muhammad Adeel; Hung-Chou Chen; Bor-Shing Lin; Chien-Hung Lai; Chun-Wei Wu; Jiunn-Horng Kang; Jian-Chiun Liou; Chih-Wei Peng
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  The effect of rest interval length on metabolic responses to the bench press exercise.

Authors:  Nicholas A Ratamess; Michael J Falvo; Gerald T Mangine; Jay R Hoffman; Avery D Faigenbaum; Jie Kang
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-01-20       Impact factor: 3.346

10.  High-intensity resistance exercise is not as effective as traditional high-intensity interval exercise for increasing the cardiorespiratory response and energy expenditure in recreationally active subjects.

Authors:  Laura Järvinen; Sofi Lundin Petersdotter; Thomas Chaillou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.