Literature DB >> 3656518

Management of upper ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

J E Lingeman1, W L Shirrell, D M Newman, P G Mosbaugh, R E Steele, J R Woods.   

Abstract

The results of 471 extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy treatments in 465 patients with solitary ureteral stones managed by several different techniques are reported. In situ treatment was performed in 123 cases without instrumentation and in 47 after placement of a ureteral catheter. Retrograde stone manipulation was performed in 245 cases immediately before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and an additional 56 were manipulated with ureteral stent placement at least 1 week before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. The success rate was significantly greater if the stone was manipulated into the kidney before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Significantly less energy (p less than 0.0001) was required for complete disintegration if the stone was free floating in the kidney. The need for subsequent procedures was significantly less (p less than 0.0001) for stones manipulated successfully into the kidney. Complications were infrequent, with the most common being ureteral perforation in 5.1 per cent of the cases, all of which were managed conservatively. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is the treatment of choice for proximal ureteral calculi because it is less morbid than percutaneous approaches and provides significantly better results than ureteroscopy. An attempt at manipulation of proximal ureteral calculi back into the kidney should be made before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3656518     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43351-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

Review 1.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of urinary calculi. Theory, efficacy, and adverse effects.

Authors:  J M Kelley
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-07

2.  In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones: experience with 65 patients.

Authors:  I Başar; T Gürpinar; A Erkan
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts?

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-05-29

4.  Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  M L Stoller
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-10

5.  Push and smash increases success rates in treatment of ureteric calculi by ESWL.

Authors:  A J Gross; A Kugler; F Seseke; R H Ringert
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Papillary Ductal Plugging is a Mechanism for Early Stone Retention in Brushite Stone Disease.

Authors:  James C Williams; Michael S Borofsky; Sharon B Bledsoe; Andrew P Evan; Fredric L Coe; Elaine M Worcester; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Experience with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for urinary calculi.

Authors:  S Dutkiewicz; K Debski; A Witoska; P Woszczyk; Z Pawluczuk
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  ESWL in situ or ureteroscopy for ureteric stones?

Authors:  J Hofbauer; C Tuerk; K Höbarth; R Hasun; M Marberger
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semi-rigid ureteroscope with lithoclast.

Authors:  Ehab R Tawfick
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2010-01-28

10.  Experience in 3,500 patients with urinary stones treated with the Dornier HM-4 bath-free lithotriptor.

Authors:  A Kostakopoulos; N I Stavropoulos; G Louras; C Deliveliotis; C Dimopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.