Literature DB >> 3655954

Febrile inpatients: house officers' use of blood cultures.

H J Makadon1, D Bor, G Friedland, P Dasse, A L Komaroff, M D Aronson.   

Abstract

The so-called "fever work-up" is time-consuming and costly. The authors examined the practices of medical house officers in obtaining blood cultures, an important part of this evaluation, as well as the ability of these physicians to predict bacteremia in febrile patients. They studied all 344 medical inpatients who experienced episodes of fever during two 30-day periods, as well as all 50 cases of bacteremia detected during these and two additional 30-day periods. House officers drew blood for culture within one day after the onset of fever in 52% of fever episodes. In 20% of these episodes only one set of cultures (representing one venipuncture) was obtained. House officers estimated the likelihood of bacteremia to be 20% or less in 15 of 40 bacteremic patients. They failed to obtain blood cultures promptly in 10% of bacteremic episodes and in 27% of episodes where the cause of fever was a nonbacteremic bacterial infection. They obtained prompt blood cultures in only a bare majority of febrile episodes, frequently underestimated the likelihood of bacteremia, and inadequately sampled blood for bacteremia. In this study, clinical judgment was not an adequate substitute for routinely obtaining blood cultures for febrile medical inpatients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3655954     DOI: 10.1007/bf02596161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  9 in total

Review 1.  Blood cultures: principles and techniques.

Authors:  J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-02       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Evaluation of positive blood cultures. Guidelines for early differentiation of contaminated from valid positive cultures.

Authors:  R R MacGregor; H N Beaty
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1972-07

3.  Blood cultures.

Authors:  M D Aronson; D H Bor
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Bacteremia at Boston City Hospital: Occurrence and mortality during 12 selected years (1935-1972), with special reference to hospital-acquired cases.

Authors:  J E McGowan; M W Barnes; M Finland
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Extra charges and prolongation of stay attributable to nosocomial infections: a prospective interhospital comparison.

Authors:  R W Haley; D R Schaberg; K B Crossley; S D Von Allmen; J E McGowan
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Routine blood cultures from febrile outpatients. Use in detecting bacteremia.

Authors:  J M Eisenberg; J D Rose; A J Weinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-12-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The clinical significance of positive blood cultures: a comprehensive analysis of 500 episodes of bacteremia and fungemia in adults. I. Laboratory and epidemiologic observations.

Authors:  M P Weinstein; L B Reller; J R Murphy; K A Lichtenstein
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb

Review 8.  Gram-negative bacteremia. IV. Re-evaluation of clinical features and treatment in 612 patients.

Authors:  B E Kreger; D E Craven; W R McCabe
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Hospital costs and mortality attributed to nosocomial bacteremias.

Authors:  R F Spengler; W B Greenough
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Residency reform: opportunity knocks.

Authors:  D A Asch; J Ende
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Two rules for early prediction of bacteremia: testing in a university and a community hospital.

Authors:  Y Yehezkelli; S Subah; G Elhanan; R Raz; A Porter; A Regev; L Leibovici
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Physical diagnosis versus modern technology. A review.

Authors:  F T Fitzgerald
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-04

5.  Fever in medical service patients.

Authors:  B A Lipsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The likelihood of bacteremia.

Authors:  W Engel
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Brief report: incidence, etiology, risk factors, and outcome of hospital-acquired fever: a systematic, evidence-based review.

Authors:  Daniel R Kaul; Scott A Flanders; James M Beck; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Fever in hospitalized medical patients: characteristics and significance.

Authors:  D H Bor; H J Makadon; G Friedland; P Dasse; A L Komaroff; M D Aronson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Clinical implications of positive blood cultures.

Authors:  C S Bryan
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 10.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.