Literature DB >> 3655146

Effect of 1.5 tesla nuclear magnetic resonance imaging scanner on implanted permanent pacemakers.

D L Hayes1, D R Holmes, J E Gray.   

Abstract

Patients with a permanent pacemaker are currently restricted from diagnostic nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging because of potential adverse effects on the pacemaker by the magnet. Previous work has shown that NMR imaging will result in asynchronous pacing of the pulse generator within a given distance of the magnet. The radiofrequency signal generated by the system may also result in rapid cardiac pacing, which may have deleterious effects. This study utilized a 1.5 tesla unit in an in vivo laboratory animal to evaluate the unit's effects on eight different pulse generators from two manufacturers. All pacemakers functioned in an asynchronous mode when placed within a certain distance of the magnet. In addition, transient reed switch inhibition was observed. Seven of the eight pulse generators paced rapidly when exposed to the radiofrequency signal and there was a dramatic decrease in arterial blood pressure. Whether effective rapid cardiac pacing would occur could not be predicted before exposure to the magnetic resonance unit. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with high magnetic fields in patients with a pacemaker should continue to be avoided until the mechanism of the rapid cardiac pacing can be further delineated and either predicted or prevented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3655146     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80270-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  20 in total

1.  MR imaging-related heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes: in vitro study.

Authors:  Daniel A Finelli; Ali R Rezai; Paul M Ruggieri; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Greg Hrdlicka; Ashwini Sharan; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Paul H Stypulkowski; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI).

Authors:  Peter Thomas Burke; Hamid Ghanbari; Patrick B Alexander; Michael K Shaw; Marcos Daccarett; Christian Machado
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Current and future role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva; Paul W X Foley
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Compatibility of temporary pacemaker myocardial pacing leads with magnetic resonance imaging: an ex vivo tissue study.

Authors:  Alexander Pfeil; Stefanie Drobnik; Reinhard Rzanny; Anas Aboud; Joachim Böttcher; Peter Schmidt; Christian Ortmann; Gita Mall; Khosro Hekmat; Bernhard Brehm; Juergen Reichenbach; Thomas E Mayer; Gunter Wolf; Andreas Hansch
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance imaging. Application to family practice.

Authors:  R H Goh; S Somers; E Jurriaans; J Yu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Francisco Leyva
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance guided electrophysiology studies.

Authors:  Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Albert C Lardo; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-07-06       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.