Literature DB >> 3654981

Dietary calcium intake and rates of bone loss in women.

B L Riggs1, H W Wahner, L J Melton, L S Richelson, H L Judd, W M O'Fallon.   

Abstract

We measured bone mineral density (BMD) at the midradius and lumbar spine in 106 normal women, ages 23-84 yr (61 were postmenopausal). Three to nine measurements (median, four) were made over 2.6 to 6.6 yr (mean, 4.1 yr). The correlation between calcium intake (range, 260-2,035 mg/d) and rate of change in BMD was not significant at the midradius (r = 0.06) or lumbar spine (r = 0.08), even after adjusting for age, menopausal status, and serum estrogen levels by multiple regression analysis. Women in the lower (mean, 501 mg/d) and in the upper (mean, 1,397 mg/d) quartiles of dietary intake had similar rates of change in BMD (%/yr [mean +/- SE], at midradius, -0.78 +/- 0.24 and -0.91 +/- 0.17 for lower and upper quartiles, respectively; at lumbar spine, -1.06 +/- 0.24 and 0.98 +/- 0.24). These data do not support the hypothesis that insufficient dietary calcium is a major cause of bone loss in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3654981      PMCID: PMC442335          DOI: 10.1172/JCI113191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  23 in total

1.  Determinants of bone mass in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J F Aloia; A N Vaswani; J K Yeh; P Ross; K Ellis; S H Cohn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1983-09

2.  Calcium intake requirement and bone mass in the elderly.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1982-09

3.  Physical activity and calcium modalities for bone mineral increase in aged women.

Authors:  E L Smith; W Reddan; P E Smith
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Long-term estrogen replacement therapy prevents bone loss and fractures.

Authors:  B Ettinger; H K Genant; C E Cann
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Calcium supplementation and postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  L Nilas; C Christiansen; P Rødbro
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-27

7.  Treatment of spinal osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B E Nordin; A Horsman; R G Crilly; D H Marshall; M Simpson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-02-16

Review 8.  Calcium nutrition and bone health in the elderly.

Authors:  R P Heaney; J C Gallagher; C C Johnston; R Neer; A M Parfitt; G D Whedon
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Bone status and fracture rates in two regions of Yugoslavia.

Authors:  V Matković; K Kostial; I Simonović; R Buzina; A Brodarec; B E Nordin
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  33 in total

1.  Familial resemblance of bone mineral density between females 18 years and older and their mothers.

Authors:  D Picard; A Imbach; M Couturier; R Lepage; M Picard
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

2.  Are calcium intakes and physical activity patterns during adolescence related to radial bone mass of white college-age females?

Authors:  F A Tylavsky; J J Anderson; R V Talmage; T N Taft
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Potential risk factors for development of postmenopausal osteoporosis--examined over a 12-year period.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Habitual dietary calcium intake and cortical bone loss in perimenopausal women: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  E C van Beresteijn; M A van 't Hof; G Schaafsma; H de Waard; S A Duursma
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Calcium supplementation of the diet: justified by present evidence.

Authors:  B E Nordin; R P Heaney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-21

Review 6.  Interaction of genetic and environmental influences on peak bone density.

Authors:  P J Kelly; J A Eisman; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A high dietary calcium intake is needed for a positive effect on bone density in Swedish postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Michaëlsson; R Bergström; L Holmberg; H Mallmin; A Wolk; S Ljunghall
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Risk factors for osteoporosis and associated fractures.

Authors:  J L Kelsey
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 9.  The calcium controversy: finding a middle ground between the extremes.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  Peak bone mass and osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  J A Eisman; P J Kelly; N A Morrison; N A Pocock; R Yeoman; J Birmingham; P N Sambrook
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.