Literature DB >> 3654944

Comparison of agar disk diffusion, microdilution broth, and agar dilution for testing antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

J A Smith1, D A Henry, A M Bourgault, L Bryan, G J Harding, D J Hoban, G B Horsman, T Marrie, P Turgeon.   

Abstract

A collection of 120 oxacillin-susceptible and 120 oxacillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) from six tertiary care hospital laboratories were tested by agar disk diffusion, three microdilution broth systems (Sensititre, Dynatech, and Alpkem), and the Vitek AutoMicrobic system for comparison with reference agar dilution results. The antimicrobial agents tested were oxacillin, cefazolin, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, cefamandole, fusidic acid, rifampin, and vancomycin. Incubation was at 30 or 35 degrees C for 24, 48, and 72 h. The broth media were supplemented with 2% NaCl for some antimicrobial agents, and the agar dilution method was used with and without the addition of 4% NaCl. The CNS were identified to species by the method of Kloos and Schleifer. The results showed a lack of concordance between two hospitals with respect to oxacillin susceptibility testing by agar dilution with no NaCl supplement. The reasons are not clear but may be related to variations in media. The 4% NaCl supplement or extended incubation to 48 h eliminated this difference. The cefazolin and cefotaxime susceptibility results in the agar disk diffusion test were unreliable if accepted at face value. Cefamandole testing correlated well with the reference method regardless of the method used, and salt supplementation is not recommended. Most of the oxacillin-resistant CNS were resistant to the other beta-lactam drugs except cefamandole. Of 22 CNS resistant to cefamandole, 21 were S. haemolyticus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3654944      PMCID: PMC269319          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.9.1741-1746.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species.

Authors:  W E Kloos; K H Schleifer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Randomized comparison of cefamandole, cefazolin, and cefuroxime prophylaxis in open-heart surgery.

Authors:  T G Slama; S J Sklar; J Misinski; S W Fess
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  G L Woods; G S Hall; I Rutherford; K J Pratt; C C Knapp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Clinical comparative study on the activity of cefamandole in the treatment of serious staphylococcal infections caused by methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant strains.

Authors:  R F Frongillo; L Donati; G Federico; P Martino; M Moroni; L Ortona; M Palumbo; B M Pasticci; E Pizzigallo; G Privitera
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Identification, clinical distribution, and susceptibility to methicillin and 18 additional antibiotics of clinical Staphylococcus isolates: nationwide investigation in Italy.

Authors:  P E Varaldo; P Cipriani; A Focá; C Geraci; A Giordano; M A Madeddu; A Orsi; R Pompei; M Prenna; A Repetto
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Effect of the source of Mueller-Hinton agar and resistance frequency on the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J A Hindler; C B Inderlied
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Composition and antimicrobic resistance of skin flora in hospitalized and healthy adults.

Authors:  E L Larson; K J McGinley; A R Foglia; G H Talbot; J J Leyden
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Staphylococcus epidermidis causing prosthetic valve endocarditis: microbiologic and clinical observations as guides to therapy.

Authors:  A W Karchmer; G L Archer; W E Dismukes
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 25.391

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Salt-supplemented medium for testing methicillin-resistant staphylococci with newer beta-lactams.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J S Redding; L A Maher; P E Ramirez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Multicenter laboratory evaluation of the bioMérieux Vitek antimicrobial susceptibility testing system with 11 antimicrobial agents versus members of the family Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  G V Doern; A B Brueggemann; R Perla; J Daly; D Halkias; R N Jones; M A Saubolle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Measurement of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli in pig feces with a hydrophobic grid membrane filter interpreter system.

Authors:  R H Dunlop; S A McEwen; A H Meek; R C Clarke; R M Friendship; W D Black; A N Sharpe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Activities of daptomycin and teicoplanin against Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus epidermidis, including evaluation of susceptibility testing recommendations.

Authors:  D E Low; A McGeer; R Poon
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Evaluation of the E test by using selected gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  J H Ngui-Yen; E A Bryce; C Porter; J A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.