Literature DB >> 3646182

Intravenous tubing containing burettes can be safely changed at 72 hour intervals.

D R Snydman, M Donnelly-Reidy, L K Perry, W J Martin.   

Abstract

No studies testing the safety of changing intravenous systems containing in-line burettes at 72 hours in an intensive care setting have been performed. Patients entering a medical or surgical intensive care unit were alternatively assigned to have any line with an in-line burette changed at either 48 hour (105 patients) or 72 hour (65 patients) intervals. Daily quantitative cultures with a 2 ml aliquot of burette fluid were obtained. Contaminated burette fluid was detected in 60 of 1181 (5.0%, 95% confidence interval, 3.7% to 6.3%) samples from the burettes changed at 48 hour intervals, and in 40 of 901 (4.4%, 95% confidence interval, 3.0% to 5.8%) samples from 72 hour interval burettes. Significant bacterial contamination of burette fluid, defined as ten or more colonies per milliliter, occurred in only seven (0.6%) cultures from patients in the 48 hour interval group compared with only three (0.3%) cultures in the 72 hour group. None of the contaminated burette fluids was associated with a primary bacteremia. Change of in-line burettes in patients in intensive care at 72-hour intervals is safe and should result in substantial cost savings to hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3646182     DOI: 10.1017/s019594170006728x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Control        ISSN: 0195-9417


  8 in total

Review 1.  The health professional's role in preventing nosocomial infections.

Authors:  H Saloojee; A Steenhoff
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Does decreasing the frequency of changing intravenous administration sets (>24 h) increase the incidence of sepsis in neonates receiving total parenteral nutrition?

Authors:  Nevart Chirinian; Vibhuti Shah
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Summary of recommendations: Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-related Infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.

Authors:  Naomi P O'Grady; Mary Alexander; Lillian A Burns; E Patchen Dellinger; Jeffrey Garland; Stephen O Heard; Pamela A Lipsett; Henry Masur; Leonard A Mermel; Michele L Pearson; Issam I Raad; Adrienne G Randolph; Mark E Rupp; Sanjay Saint
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Controversies in hospital infection control.

Authors:  F D Daschner; U Frank
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  C R Reed; C N Sessler; F L Glauser; B A Phelan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  Pathogenesis of infections related to intravascular catheterization.

Authors:  D A Goldmann; G B Pier
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 8.  Optimal timing for intravascular administration set replacement.

Authors:  Amanda J Ullman; Marie L Cooke; Donna Gillies; Nicole M Marsh; Azlina Daud; Matthew R McGrail; Elizabeth O'Riordan; Claire M Rickard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.