Literature DB >> 3634779

Coagulase production by strains of Staphylococcus aureus of differing resistance characters: a comparison of two traditional methods with a latex agglutination system detecting both clumping factor and protein A.

J I Dickson, R R Marples.   

Abstract

Five groups of strains of Staphylococcus aureus (54 in total) were tested by slide and tube coagulase methods with rabbit and human plasma, and the results were compared with a latex test for both clumping factor and Protein A (Staphaurex, Wellcome Foundation). The five groups comprised: epidemic methicillin resistant S aureus (group 1); other methicillin resistant S aureus (group 2); other resistant S aureus (group 3); other S aureus (group 4); and a group of reference strains, not all true S aureus (group 5). Groups 1, 3, and 4 gave consistently strong positive results with the tube test and the latex test and less strong positive results with the slide test. Group 2 strains sometimes gave weak or negative results in slide and latex tests, but tube tests with both types of plasma were strongly positive. Only within group 5 strains were negative results in the tube test found. Group 1 strains showed no diminution in expression of free coagulase or of clumping factor. The latex test was more sensitive than the slide test but less sensitive than the tube test. Doubtful or negative slide test or latex test results, particularly with strains resistant to methicillin, should be checked by a tube coagulase test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3634779      PMCID: PMC499831          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.39.4.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  3 in total

1.  Workshop on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus held at the headquarters of the Public Health Laboratory Service on 8 January 1985.

Authors:  R R Marples; E M Cooke
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Changing resistance to antimicrobial drugs, and resistance typing in clinically significant strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  J F Richardson; R R Marples
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Clumping factor defective methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R Lally; B Woolfrey
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.267

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Coagulase testing compared with commercial kits for routinely identifying Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A S Rossney; L F English; C T Keane
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Comparative evaluation of a latex test for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M Stevens; C Geary
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Evaluation of a direct identification method for Staphylococcus aureus from blood culture broth.

Authors:  A C Hamoudi; M M Hribar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  New type of staphylococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  E G Smyth; E D Wright; R R Marples
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Protein A and coagulase expression in epidemic and non-epidemic Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J I Roberts; M A Gaston
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Staphaurex reappraised: role of protein A in false positive results and recommendations for use.

Authors:  A J Mifsud; S C Parker
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  "Staphaurex" negative, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M A Coles; D F Brown
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  In Vitro Assay for Quantifying Clumping of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Heidi A Crosby; Jakub M Kwiecinski; Alexander R Horswill
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

9.  Gene silencing of Diaphorina citri candidate effectors promotes changes in feeding behaviors.

Authors:  Inaiara de Souza Pacheco; Diogo Manzano Galdeano; Nathalie Kristine Prado Maluta; Joao Roberto Spotti Lopes; Marcos Antonio Machado
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.